check list on why NOT to vote for Daniel Squadron ✓has 100% approval rating by the biggest abortion on demand orginazation ✓one of the major pushers of same gender "marriage" ✓the leading sponsor of genda (This could force sefariem stores to hire men with skirts, and would allow men in to woman's bathrooms) ✓wants to make NY have more abortions (41% is to low) ✓has the endorsement of 3 leading gay orginazations
Aroniem (Satmar) rally behind Daniel Squadron who was a key vote for toevah marriage and a lead sponsor behind the bathroom bill.
Both United States Senators from New York, Senators Chuck Schumer
and
Kirsten Gillibrand, have voiced their support for the bill, as did New
York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman who voted for it when he was in
the senate!
The Sponsor of the bill, Williamsburg State Senator Daniels Squadron recently sent out a press release urging immediate passage of this evil bill!
Daniel Squadron took over the role of sponsoring this bill after for the gay Thomas Duane retired
If every single Orthodox Jews in
Williamsburg, and the Lower East Side would have allied together and
voted for the same candidate based on "Toras Hashem" and not "kesef yane
es hakol" they very likley would have put a yorai shomiyiem in the
state senate instead of this low life. It's even possible that toevah
"marriage" never would have passed (it passed by 2 votes and based on
the inside Albany politics they "needed to pass it by 2 votes) Instead Daniel Squadron is now A?the? leading candidate for NYC public advocate! Send a message that the Torah is not for sale by voting against him this year in the primary!
We urge Every single Orthodox Jew in NY to call the state legislators to prevent the passage of this evil bill!
for the remainder of this post all those politicians who acted problematically that have a decent sized Orthodox population in
their district will be highlighted yellow, those that have a sizable
Orthodox community will be highlighted green, "orthodox"politicians are in blue.
The bill:
S195-2013: Prohibits "discrimination" based on gender identity or
expression and includes offenses regarding gender identity or expression
under the hate crimes statute
24 1. The opportunity to obtain employment without discrimination because
25 of age, race, creed, color, national origin, sexual orientation, GENDER 26 IDENTITY OR EXPRESSION, military status, sex, marital status, or disa-
27 bility, is hereby recognized as and declared to be a civil right.
This
means that Seforim Store in Flatbush, or a Pizza store in Borough Park,
or a Sheitel store in Williamsburg, will be forced to hire a man who
dresses as a woman and could not fire someone who decides to "change"
from a man to a woman.
30 (a) It shall be an unlawful discriminatory practice for any person,
31 being the owner, lessee, proprietor, manager, superintendent, agent or
32 employee of any place of public accommodation, resort or amusement,
33 because of the race, creed, color, national origin, sexual orientation,
34 GENDER IDENTITY OR EXPRESSION, military status, sex, [or] disability or
35 marital status of any person, directly or indirectly, to refuse, with-
36 hold from or deny to such person any of the accommodations, advantages,
37 facilities or privileges thereof, including the extension of credit, or,
38 directly or indirectly, to publish, circulate, issue, display, post or
39 mail any written or printed communication, notice or advertisement, to
40 the effect that any of the accommodations, advantages, facilities and
41 privileges of any such place shall be refused, withheld from or denied
42 to any person on account of race, creed, color, national origin, sexual
43 orientation, GENDER IDENTITY OR EXPRESSION, military status, sex, [or]
44 disability or marital status, or that the patronage or custom thereat of
45 any person of or purporting to be of any particular race, creed, color,
46 national origin, sexual orientation, GENDER IDENTITY OR EXPRESSION,
47 military status, sex or marital status, or having a disability is unwel-
48 come, objectionable or not acceptable, desired or solicited.
public accommodation includes locker rooms, dorm rooms, and bathrooms.
This
means that you have to allow men dressed as women into any bathroom he
chooses. Besides just the basic moral problems this is almost
guaranteed to increase rapes and pedophiles. Since woman are much less
likely to be a pedophile or to rape someone, if a man who was dressed as
a woman would enter a woman's bathroom where there are no witnesses it
would be easier to get away with the crime.
Even one of the main LGBT organizations
in NY admits that bill will lead to boys using girls bathrooms! "gender
identity" means the "gender" you feel like regardless of what sex you
are.
Furthermore even one of the most read gay blogs queerty admitted that this bill will allow boys in to girls bathrooms
The New York State Senate’s Judiciary Committee today voted down GENDA,
Sen. Tom Duane’s bill that would’ve made all public accommodations —
including restrooms, health clubs, dorm rooms, and even shelters — open
to individuals who identify as a certain gender, even if their
biological sex doesn’t match the facilities’ mandates, allowing a MTF
transgender person to use the lady’s toilet or find refuge at a
women-only domestic violence shelter. The bill was defeated by one
lawmaker in a 11-12 vote. Among those voting no: Sen. Ruben Diaz, the
proud homophobe who helped defeat the state’s gay marriage law. Diaz, who talks publicly about his two gay brothers,
was the only Democrat to vote against GENDA; Sen. George Maziarz, a
Republican, previously said he would support the bill but voted against
it.
the Conservative Party released this statement in 2010 on this bill
"If this bill is enacted, how safe will our most vulnerable be? Will
sexual predators be able to stalk victims by claiming they are allowed
to enter the restroom because they are protected by law? Proponents of
the bill say they are the ones being discriminated against, but what
about the rights of the majority of New Yorkers who expect restrooms to
accommodate their sex only?" they say.
"Many larger public places offer unisex facilities at the present
time, if this law is enacted, the cost to business could be prohibitive
and if small businesses cannot provide for unisex restrooms, trial
lawyers will ultimately put them out of business," the party's statement
continues. "The majority of people do not want the opposite sex in
their restrooms, no matter how they are dressed or feel about their
bodies. People using public restrooms have a right to privacy that
enactment of this proposal would erode."
Notice that Steven Cymbrowitz voted no even though in past years he was a sponsor
this is because Cymbrowitz just ran a very close race against a Orthodox Jew "Ben Akselrod" who ran a campaign based on Torah values where he only won by 294 votes.
This shows us that we can effect politicians votes if we vote based on the Torah!
______________________________________________________________________________
Proof we can defeat this bill
In 2010 this bill was defeated by 1 vote despite the fact that the democrats controled the senate because democratic senator Ruben Diaz held strong in the vote in the Judiciary Committee despite the democrat establishments pressure on him to vote for that bill. It is almost guaranteed this evil bill would have passed if it went to the whole floor. for more info about the vote
S2406-2009 Votesthe highlights here are based on the time of the vote
Philadelphia Mayor signing bill that would allow men in womans bathrooms
some selected parts of the anti basic decency bill
It shall be an unlawful public accommodations practice to
(.4) Refuse,withhold
from, or deny any person access to any separate-gender bathroom where
the person's gender identity is consistent with the gender for which
such bathroom is reserved.
____
§ 16-104. Gender-Neutral Bathrooms.
(1) Definitions.
(a) Gender Identity. Shall have the meaning given in § 9-1102(1).
(b) Gender-Neutral
Bathroom. A bathroom that is designated for use by any person or
persons, regardless of Gender Identity.
(2) Gender-Neutral Bathrooms.
(a) Any
new building constructed by the City shall include Gender-Neutral
Bathrooms in number and location appropriate to the building's use.
(b) Whenever
the City renovates a building that it owns or occupies, or any portion
of a building that it owns or occupies, and such renovation includes
renovation of bathrooms, Gender-Neutral Bathrooms in number and location
appropriate to the use of the building or portion thereof so renovated
shall be established.
(1) Effectiveone year after the effective date of this Ordinance, all newforms issued by any City department, board, or commission shall not includerequests for gender-specific identification. Such formsshall include, for example, the term “Parent/Legal Guardian” instead of “Mother” or “Father.”Where
it is necessary to request the gender of a person, an option shall be
provided for that person to select the option “self-identify” for the
person's gender in addition to the options of “male” and “female.”
if you live in Philadelphia this bill would also pay out millions in new "benefits" to gays out of your hard earned tax payer money.
article on the law from a gay rights blog
Philadelphia Mayor Michael Nutter today signed into law the most
extensive civil rights protections and benefits for lesbian, gay,
bisexual and transgender people in the nation.“Mayor
Michael Nutter and gay rights advocates say it makes Philadelphia the
first big city in the U.S. to offer tax credits to companies that extend
the same health care coverage to LGBT employees’ life partners and
their children as they already provide to heterosexual spouses and their
children,” the Greenwich Time reports:
Councilman James Kenney sponsored the bill. He says it
also makes Philadelphia the first city to give businesses tax credits
for offering transgender-specific health benefits. Among other things, the measure also requires gender-neutral
bathrooms in city-owned buildings and revises Philadelphia’s
anti-discrimination law to include transgender people.
The bill revamps “the city’s health-care plan to ban discrimination
against non-union transgender city employees, and would instate a
Transgender Health Tax Credit that would encourage companies to offer
transgender-specific health-insurance coverage to the transgender
community,” South Florida Gay News reported last month:
City buildings would also be required to provide
gender-neutral bathrooms, and the measure would clarify what constitutes
employment discrimination in the city’s nondiscrimination law.
The bill won with a near-sweeping victory, with Councilman-at-Large
Bill Green being the only Democrat to vote against it. Republican
Councilmen-at-Large David Oh and Brian O’Neill voted against the bill.
