. . . ופירוש למען ספות הרוה את הצמאה -
להוסיף השבעה עם המתאוה, כי נפש שבעה תקרא רוה, כענין ורויתי נפש הכהנים דשן ועמי
את טובי ישבעו (ירמיה לא יג), והיתה נפשם כגן רוה (שם פסוק יא), והמתאוה תקרא
צמאה, צמאה לך נפשי (תהלים סג ב). והטעם, כי נפש האדם הרוה שאיננה מתאוה לדברים
הרעים לה, כאשר תבא בלבו קצת התאוה והוא ימלא תאותו אז יוסיף בנפשו תאוה יתירה
ותהיה צמאה מאד לדבר ההוא שאכל או שעשה יותר מבראשונה, ותתאוה עוד לדברים רעים שלא
היתה מתאוה להם מתחלה. כי המתאוה לזמת הנשים היפות, כשיהיה שטוף בזמתן תבואהו תאוה
לבוא על הזכר ועל הבהמה, וכיוצא בזה בשאר התאוות, וכענין שהזכירו חכמים (סוכה נב
ב) משביעו רעב מרעיבו שבע. ולכך יאמר הכתוב בהולך בשרירות לבו, שהוא אם ימלא נפשו
בתאוות השרירות והחזקות עליו אשר היא צמאה להם, יוסיף נפשו הרוה עם הצמאה, כי
יתאוה ויצמא למה שהיה שבע ממנו וכאשר השביע נפשו בו. ולפי שהזכיר "שרש
פורה" אמר בלשון הזה, כי יוסיף השרש הוא כפתו אשר היא רוה ורעננה עם הצמאה
ותשובנה כולם צמאות:
Bestiality brothels are 'spreading through Germany' warns campaigner as abusers turn to sex with animals as 'lifestyle choice'
By
Matt Blake PUBLISHED:
11:53 EST, 1 July 2013
|
UPDATED:
11:58 EST, 1 July 2013
Bestiality brothels are spreading
through Germany faster than ever thanks to a law that makes animal porn
illegal but sex with animals legal, a livestock protection officer has
warned. Madeleine
Martin told the Frankfurter Rundschau that current laws were not
protecting animals from predatory zoophiles who are increasingly able to
turn to bestiality as a 'lifestyle choice'. She
highlighted one case where a farmer in the Gross-Gerau region of
southwest Germany, noticed his once friendly flock of sheep were
beginning to shy away from human contact.
So he rigged a CCTV camera in the
rafters of his barn to discover multiple men sneaking in during the
night to sexually abuse his beloved livestock.
'There
are now animal brothels in Germany,' Martin told the paper, adding that
people were playing down the issue by by describing it as a
'lifestyle choice'.
Armed with a host of similar case
studies, Ms Martin is now calling for the government to categorically
ban bestiality across the country. Last
November German authorities said they were planning to reinstate an old
law forbidding sex with animals after a sharp rise in incidents of
bestiality along with websites promoting it.
Parliament
began debating changes to the national Animal Protection Code with the
agricultural committee of the Bundestag pledging fines of up to £20,000
for a first offence.
Bestiality
dropped off the statute books as a crime in 1969 but in recent years
the number of people believed to be participating in such acts has
increased significantly.
There are even 'erotic zoos' which people can visit to abuse animals ranging from llamas to goats.
Hans-Michael
Goldmann, chairman of the agriculture committee, said the government
aimed to forbid using an animal 'for individual sexual acts and to
outlaw people 'pimping' creatures to others for sexual use.'
German 'zoophile' group ZETA has announced it will mount a legal challenge should a ban on bestiality become law. 'Mere concepts of morality have no business being law,' said ZETA chairman Michael Kiok.
When
the 1969 law banning sex with animals was banned the Animal Protection
Law was introduced, but it failed to include a specific ban on
zoophilia.
The terms bestiality and zoophilia are the formal names for having sex with animals for pleasure.
If We Fought things like this we wouldn't need an assifa every year!
written by Penny Young Nance
I think you would agree: today’s television programming already goes far enough — too far, in fact.
Hollywood shock jocks have successfully snuck in more sex, violence,
and profanity, making it hard for parents to find “smut-free” zones on
the public airwaves suitable for their families.
The last thing we need is more filth and vulgarity.
Even though 75 percent of Americans want more
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) restrictions on public
television content, the FCC is considering dropping current broadcast
decency standards that ban explicit profanity and “non-sexual” nudity.
By age 18, an American teenager will have seen 16,000 simulated murders and 200,000 acts of violence
With America already undergoing a huge indecency problem, it’s
unfathomable to think the FCC actually wants to allow more filth such as
frontal female nudity, the F-bomb, and the “S” word on broadcast
television during hours when our kids will be watching and listening.
Evidently, the F-bomb and other obscenities are more common in the
nation’s vernacular, but I know that parents of young kids work hard to
shield them from picking up vulgarities.
When I served as Special Advisor for then-FCC Chairman Kevin Martin, I
constantly received comments from moms and dads who were fed up and
rightly so.
Raunchy images and lewd gestures steal our children’s innocence. By
age 18, an American teenager will have seen 16,000 simulated murders and
200,000 acts of violence, according to the American Psychiatric Association. And the Parents Television Council
reports that these vast amounts of graphic images and obscenity are
causing long term and irreparable damage, including desensitization,
disrespect for parents, and a lack of empathy for human suffering.
Parents do have a responsibility to protect their children from
obscenity. And ideally, parents would have the sole authority and power
to monitor the airwaves. But that just isn’t our reality.
According to the Kaiser Family Foundation,
children 8 to18 years old consume a total of seven hours and 38 minutes
of screen time every day — more than the time they spend at school!
Half of these children live in households with absolutely zero
restrictions on the media they consume, and a mere five percent of
parents actually watch the programs their children are watching.
Additionally, today’s digital world has fostered a generation of kids
more tech savvy than their parents, and they can easily maneuver around
parental blocks on televisions.
However, even if the blocking system is firmly in place, the
individual show ratings are given by the networks themselves and often
do not meet the criteria set by parents.
Live sports shows in which players drop expletives will never be
caught by filters, which is why the networks need to feel the pressure
to institute the good old thirty-second-delay feature. Parents have
limited choices, but we must not give up.
Parental responsibility also does not acquit corporate decorum.
Broadcasters are given free license to broadcast, and in exchange, are
simply required to meet minimal standards of conduct. In fact, the FCC’s
authority is so limited that it can only regulate public television
from 6 a.m. to 10 p.m.
Because parents — the public — own these airwaves, shouldn’t we have
some say over how they’re used? The answer is “of course!” And ratings
speak volumes.
Profit incentives are found in wholesome family entertainment.
Consider the History Channel’s ground-breaking series, “The Bible.” This
dramatization of the Gospel opened with a two-hour premier that
garnered a record-breaking 13.1 million viewers. By the end of the series’ run, the History Channel was the top cable network in total viewership. This level of success is not unusual for Christian productions.
In 2004, the commercial blockbuster, “The Passion” raked in $611,899,420 in ticket sales worldwide.
Hollywood needs to pay attention.
Other top-rated family shows include Fox’s “American Idol” and A&E’s “Duck Dynasty,” which broke records recently when 9.6 million viewers tuned in for the show's final episode.
May 20 is the cut-off date set by the FCC to receive the public’s
feedback on its consideration to slash its broadcast decency standards.
You’d better believe they’ll be hearing from my organization, Concerned
Women for America Legislative Action Committee, as we engage the FCC and
move to the front lines of the fight to protect America’s children and
families with our “Stop the FCC” petition. We already have 12,000 signatures from concerned parents and grandparents across the nation.
The FCC is failing America’s families, giving broadcasters unfettered
access to our children to peddle their vulgarity in the name of
“freedom of speech.” We won’t stand for it. For more on the "Stop the FCC" petition visit http://www.cwalac.org/stopthefcc.shtml. Penny Young Nance is president and CEO of Concerned Women for America.
