United to Save America

not to inform, but to CHANGE.

Showing posts with label chavez. Show all posts
Showing posts with label chavez. Show all posts

Monday, June 24, 2013

Confused 6 Year Boy Officially Allowed To Use Girls Bathroom In School


I suppose his hair is really purple also
DENVER — A Colorado school district "discriminated" against a transgender first grader when it refused to let "her" use the girl’s bathroom, the state’s civil rights division has determined, a decision gay and transgender advocates say will have an indelible impact on how such cases are handled in the future.

In a sharply worded ruling, the division concluded that the Fountain-Fort Carson School District needlessly created a situation in which the student, Coy Mathis, would be subject to "harassment" when it barred "her" from the girls’ bathroom even though "she" clearly identified as female. 

Telling Coy “that "she" must disregard "her" identity while performing one of the most essential human functions constitutes severe and pervasive treatment, and creates an environment that is objectively and subjectively hostile, intimidating or offensive,” Steven Chavez, the division director, wrote in the decision.  to see more about this guy read the link.

The dispute over whether Coy, 6, should be allowed to use the girls’ bathroom was seen by some as a critical test of how state antidiscrimination laws were applied to transgender students. 

Born biologically a boy, Coy began identifying as a girl after just a few years, growing "her" wispy blond hair long, wearing dresses, and telling family and friends they should refer to "her" as female. 

During kindergarten, Coy’s parents informed "her" school that their child identified as a girl and should be treated as one. Initially, the school, just south of Colorado Springs, agreed. 

But a few months into first grade, the district barred Coy from using the girls’ bathroom, telling "her" parents that as "she" grew older and developed, some students and parents would likely become uncomfortable. It was best that Coy use staff bathrooms or a gender-neutral one in the school’s health office, the district officials decided. 

Furious, the Mathises pulled Coy from school and lodged a complaint with the state’s civil rights division in February, claiming the district had violated Colorado’s 2008 antidiscrimination statute, which expanded provisions for transgender people. 

After an investigation, the division, which enforces Colorado’s antidiscrimination laws, agreed. It noted that while Coy’s birth certificate stated "she" was male — an argument made by the school district — more recent medical and legal documents identified "her" as female. 

It was clear, the state said, that Coy had completely integrated into society as a "girl" — wearing girls’ clothing, standing in the girls’ line at school and choosing to play with girls. 

But the state’s ruling went even further, saying that evolving research on transgender development showed that “compartmentalizing a child as a boy or a girl solely based on their visible anatomy, is a simplistic approach to a difficult and complex issue.” 

Depriving Coy of the acceptance that students need to succeed in school, Mr. Chavez wrote, “creates a barrier where none should exist, and entirely disregards the charging party’s gender identity.” 

Michael D. Silverman, the executive director of the Transgender Legal Defense and Education Fund, which filed the complaint on the Mathises’ behalf, hailed the decision as a momentous victory and hoped it would sway how other school districts treated transgender students. 

According to the group, 17 states and the District of Columbia offer some form of legal protections for transgender people. And the issue of how schools treat transgender students has grown especially prominent in recent years. 

“This is the first ruling in the nation that holds that transgender students be allowed to use bathrooms that match who they are,” he said. “There are thousands of families like the Mathises who are feeling relieved and vindicated that the commission ruled that Coy is a "girl" just like any other "girl".” 

A lawyer for the school district did not respond to requests for comment. The school district had argued it acted reasonably in the dispute, saying Coy was permitted to wear girls’ clothing to school and was referred to as female. 

The Mathises have since moved to Aurora, Colo., and plan to enroll Coy in school there. 

“We knew that this was discrimination. So it was validating to get the state to say ‘Yes, it is very clearly harassment,’ and they were doing something they shouldn’t have been doing,” said Kathryn Mathis, Coy’s mother. 

“When I told Coy we won, "she" got this giant smile and "her" eyes bugged out. "She" said, ‘So I can go to school and make friends?’ ” 
(NY Times)
Posted by editor at 9:54 AM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: boy in girls bathroom, chavez, Colorado, Colorado's Anti-Discrimination Act, Coy Mathis, Eagleside elementary school, gender-neutral faculty bathrooms, Michael Silverman, Silverman, steven chavez, Transgender

Friday, June 7, 2013

Colorado Sues Religious Cake Store Owner Because He Refused To Bake Cake For Gay "Wedding"



CHICK3_WEB
The Cake Shop that refused to help out in that "wedding"



DENVER –  A gay couple is pursuing a discrimination complaint against a Colorado bakery, saying the business refused them a wedding cake to honor their Massachusetts ceremony, and alleging that the owners have a history of turning away same-sex couples.

As more states move to legalize same-sex "marriage" and civil unions, the case highlights a growing tension between gay rights advocates and supporters of religious freedom.

"Religious freedom is a fundamental right in America and it's something that we champion at the ACLU," said Mark Silverstein, the legal director of the group in Colorado, which filed the complaint on behalf of the couple. "We are all entitled to our religious beliefs and we fight for that. But someone's personal religious beliefs don't justify breaking the law by discriminating against others in the public sphere."

The attorney for Jack Phillips, one of the owners of Masterpiece Cakeshop, sees it differently.
"We don't believe that this is a case about commerce. At its heart, this is a case about conscience," said Nicolle Martin. She said the matter is important because it will serve as an example for future cases across the country as more gay couples gain legal recognitions for their relationships.

"It brings it to the forefront. I just don't think that we should heighten one person's beliefs over and above another person's beliefs," she said.

The Colorado Attorney General's office filed a formal complaint last week after the ACLU initiated the process last year on behalf of David Mullins and Charlie Craig. The case is scheduled for a hearing in September before Colorado's Civil Rights Commission.


Nationwide, 12 states now allow gay" marriage", with Rhode Island, Delaware and Minnesota doing so this year. And in a year that Colorado lawmakers approved civil unions, they also elected the first gay Speaker of the House.

But Colorado's civil union law does not provide religious protections for businesses despite the urging of Republican lawmakers. Democrats argued that such a provision would give businesses cover to discriminate.

Mullins, 28, and Craig, 33, filed the discrimination complaint against Phillips after visiting his business in suburban Denver last summer. After a few minutes looking at pictures of different cakes, the couple said Phillips told them he wouldn't make one for them when he found out it was to celebrate their wedding in Colorado after they got "married" in Massachusetts. Phillips has said making a wedding cake for gay couples would violate his Christian religious beliefs, according to the complaint.

"We were all very upset, but I was angry and I felt dehumanized and mortified," Mullins said. He said he vented his frustration on Facebook and was surprised at how "the story ended up catching fire," with responses from local media and bloggers in other countries posting about it.

"We felt that the best way to honor the support that they had given us was to follow this complaint through," he said. In the process, the ACLU said they found out about two other gay couples who had been refused a wedding cake from the same shop. Both have written affidavits in support of the discrimination claim.

Recent advances on gay rights only underscore Colorado's difficult past on the issue. In 2006, voters banned gay "marriage". More notably, in 1992, voters approved a ban on municipal antidiscrimination laws to protect gays, leading some to brand Colorado a "hate state." Four years later, the U.S. Supreme Court said the law, known as Amendment 2, was unconstitutional.

The complaint seeks to force Masterpiece Cakeshop to "cease and desist" the practice of refusing wedding cakes for gay couples, and to tell the public that their business is open to everyone.

If Phillips loses the case and refuses to comply with the order, he would face fines of $500 per case and up to a year in jail, his attorney said.

"It would force him to choose between his conscience and a paycheck. I just think that's an intolerable choice," Martin said.
(AP)


The key point of the states legal "claim" is that to refuse to help a toeivah "wedding" is the same thing as refusing to help the person because their a toevanick.  This is what gay "rights" really means.  The state doesn't (choose to) understand that there is a big difference between refusing to provide a wedding cake for a toeivah "wedding" versus refusing to sell a toevanick a slice of pizza (which can also be a problem if there are 2 together for example).



Notice how they confuse the person with the avarah, this is what all gay "rights" bills do

The bigoted Government Official who is attacking religious liberty
Here's the complete official documents.
the states law suit (that the picture above is a sampling of)
the original statement by the gay terrorist
the court summons from the 2 gay terrorists
the statements from other gay terrorists who joined in the suit.



a similar story happened recently in Oregon both states do not have same gender "marriage"

an article from when the story broke

Posted by editor at 12:46 PM 2 comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: aclu, ACLU of Colorado, chavez, Colorado, freedom of religion, gay terrorists, Jack Phillips, Mark Silverstein, Masterpiece Cakeshop, Phillips, religious freedom, Silverstein, steven chavez, wedding cake
Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Follow Us On

twitter
facebook
you can email us at
robertadler47@gmail.com

Translate

Search This Blog

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2016 (2)
    • ▼  September (2)
      • Issur to vote for a candidate who supports assiste...
      • 2016 NY State Endorsements and Assisted Suicide Ps...
  • ►  2015 (80)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (4)
    • ►  August (11)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (9)
    • ►  April (9)
    • ►  March (11)
    • ►  February (11)
    • ►  January (10)
  • ►  2014 (129)
    • ►  December (11)
    • ►  November (14)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (13)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (13)
    • ►  June (15)
    • ►  May (6)
    • ►  April (12)
    • ►  March (12)
    • ►  February (9)
    • ►  January (17)
  • ►  2013 (241)
    • ►  December (19)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (22)
    • ►  September (15)
    • ►  August (25)
    • ►  July (20)
    • ►  June (34)
    • ►  May (30)
    • ►  April (51)
    • ►  March (20)
    • ►  February (3)
Awesome Inc. theme. Powered by Blogger.