Gay Activist Shows His Bigotry, Racism, and Antisemitism

Gay Activist Christopher Li-Reid showing his racism

Gay Activist Christopher Li-Reid  showing his antisemitism

Types Of Fear Mongering That led To The Veto Of The Arizona Freedom Of Religion Over Homosexuality Bill

This is an example of the type of false attacks on a bill that's only allows people to not to be forced to violate their religion

I think they got this backwards it's going to be gays doing this to religious people

Just For The Record The Bill Never Mentions Anything To Do With Homosexuality Only The Free Practice Of Religon

With Attacks Like This The Fake Conservative Jan Brewer Vetoed The Bill

Senator Elect Cory Booker Mocks Religious People

LAMBERTVILLE, N.J. (AP) — 

Gay "couples" exchanged vows in early morning ceremonies in several New Jersey communities Monday (A day of Tzom and Selichos) as the state began recognizing their "marriages" at 12:01 a.m., becoming the 14th state to do so.

The hastily planned first "weddings" to legally unite long-time couples were planned for a state Senator's grand home in Elizabeth, the boardwalk in Asbury Park and government buildings in small towns and big cities.

In the arts community of Lambertville, Mayor David DelVecchio led the ceremony to "marry" Beth Asaro and Joanne Schailey. He also presided when they joined in a "civil union" the minute they became recognized in the state in February 2007.

Soon after they cut the cake, DelVecchio handed Asaro a pink "marriage" license. "We're floating on air," she said. Added Schailey, "It's like winning the Super Bowl."

The "couple", both wearing suits, hosted a reception attended by friends, family and several politicians. The song "In the Mood" played.

Asaro, a member of the city council in Lambertville, said they wanted to get "married" at the first moment, in part, to promote the "gay-friendliness" of their community north of Trenton.

"This shows to the world that Lambertville is open for business," DelVecchio said.

In Newark, Mayor Cory Booker was "marrying" the first of several couples when someone attempted to disrupt the ceremony.

Booker had asked if anyone had reason to object to the marriage and a protester screamed "This is unlawful in the eyes of God and JC."

Booker, who was elected to the U.S. Senate last week, called for the person to be removed and police dragged him out.

As Booker continued speaking, "...not hearing any substantive and worthy objections," thunderous applause erupted.

The "weddings" came amid a flurry of legal activity after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in June that the federal government should recognize gay "marriages" and confer couples with the same benefits that it does for heterosexual married couples, including joint tax filings, the right to live together in government-funded nursing homes and Social Security survivor benefits.

A state judge last month agreed with advocates who said that by allowing "civil unions" but not "marriage", New Jersey was keeping gay "couples" in the state from legal "equality".

The administration of Gov. Chris Christie, a Republican and possible 2016 presidential candidate, appealed both the ruling and Monday's implementation date to the state Supreme Court.

And on Friday, less than 60 hours before the weddings were to begin, the state's top court refused to delay them while it sorts out the overall case. The court said the state is not likely to prevail.

State Sen. Ray Lesniak said late Sunday he believes there are enough votes to override Christie's gay "marriage" veto in the Senate and that he expects a vote after the Nov. 5 election.

"Though we are 99 percent sure based on the unanimous opinion against the stay that the Supreme Court will uphold so called "marriage" "equality", we'd like to be 100 percent sure," Lesniak said.

Many of the people who have long fought for the right for gay "couples" to "marry" had been bracing for a delay, even while they were optimistic the state's top court would ultimately force New Jersey to recognize same-sex "marriage".

For the first "couples" to "tie the knot" legally, it's been a weekend of fast "wedding" planning and confusion.
Some towns began taking applications for same-sex "marriage" licenses on Thursday and continued even after the state government told them not to until there was clarity from the courts.

Other towns refused to grant licenses even after the state Health Department????? said Friday evening that towns should accept the applications.

It's expected that a rush of "weddings" will continue in coming days as couples are able to get licenses.
(AP)

Liberal "Jewish" twitterer Wants Orthodox Jews To Leave America!

 

Russell (the antisemite) Schaffer - twitter telling us to leave

Study Finds Media Supports Toevah "Marriage", But What About The Orthodox Media

Pro Toevah reporter Yosef Rapaport

Study Finds Supportive Tilt to Gay Marriage Coverage (What About The Orthodox Jewish Media)

By BRIAN STELTER like usual highlights are mine

Published: June 17, 2013

News organizations are far more likely to present a supportive view of same-sex marriage than an antagonistic view, according to a content study by the Pew Research Center to be released on Monday.

The researchers assessed a representative sample of mainstream coverage for two months this year, and found that many stories contained either a balanced mix of views or no views at all. But of the rest, roughly five times as many stories were weighted toward support for same-sex marriage as were weighted toward opposition. 

“A story was deemed to be in support of or opposition to same-sex marriage if the statements expressing that view outnumbered opposing statements by at least 2-to-1,” the report stated. 

It added, “The level of support conveyed in the news media examined here goes beyond the level seen in public opinion surveys.” The imbalance was evident both in reporting and in commentary, and on all three of the major cable news channels, Fox News, MSNBC and CNN. 

The study lends credence to conservative charges that the nation’s news media have championed the issue of same-sex marriage at the expense of objectivity. Others have argued that news organizations are right not to overly emphasize opposition to what many see as a core civil rights issue.  (notice how the New York Times Story on Bias Shows Bias)

The researchers noted in their report that many of the developments that the news media were covering were intrinsically positive for the gay rights movement, including votes in favor of same-sex marriage on the state level. 

The researchers separately looked at Twitter postings about the topic this year, which were “almost evenly divided between support and opposition for the measure — closely reflecting public opinion.”
(New York Times)

Gay NY State Senator Wants To Ban Conversion Therapy, No Word Yet On Abortion

Gay NY State Senator from Greenwich Village who want to ban What almost 200 Rabbis said is a chiyuv to try!

 It remains to be seen if he will also ban Abortion for a minor!
or at least force a parental consent or notification.

(read the bill)
ALBANY - The state Senate’s only openly gay lawmaker wants to outlaw a controversial therapy that attempts to make gay youth straight.

Legislation introduced Friday by Sen. Brad Hoylman (D-Manhattan) would bar mental health providers from trying to change the sexual orientation of anyone under the age of 18.

If enacted, a licensed mental health provider who ignored the law would be cited for unprofessional conduct and subject to licensing sanctions.
Hoylman will co-sponsor the bill in the Senate with Michael Gianaris (D-Queens). It is being carried in the Assembly by Deborah Glick, a Manhattan Democrat who is a lesbian.

Conversion therapy has been rejected by many in the mental health community.

Hoylman, who is "married" to a man and has a two-year-old daughter, said the controversial treatment is not good for the individual or society.

“It not only is impossible, but it is detrimental to young people to attempt to convert them,” he said.
“It also increases the stigma in society and creates a culture of unacceptance for young gay and lesbian people,” Hoylman added.

California last year enacted a similar law barring the controversial therapy, but the measure is on hold while it’s being challenged in the courts.

The Rev. Jason McGuire, executive director of New Yorkers for Constitutional Freedoms, doesn’t believe a New York law would pass legal or ethical muster.

“I simply believe that those in the homosexual community should recognize that there is a significant population in that community that want to leave that lifestyle and pursue a heterosexuality lifestyle,” McGuire said. “People should respect their choice to pursue that.”

(Daily News)