Pedophile Molester's Defense; "Jewish Law" Allows Same Gender "Marriage" For 13 Years Olds!

Pedophile claims "marriage" as an excuse for statutory rape

Andrew Goodman, 28, is facing a federal case of sex with a minor, but he argued that he was married under "Jewish" law to the kid.

Andrew Goodman, 28, stunned a Brooklyn state courtroom last summer when he turned to the traumatized teen and said, “I fell in love with you,” before a judge gave him only two years in prison for years-long abuse that started when the kid was just 12.

That’s chutzpah.

A Jewish pedophile who publicly professed his love to the boy he molested is now trying to beat a federal sex rap by claiming he and the child victim were "married".

Andrew Goodman, 28, stunned a Brooklyn state courtroom last summer when he turned to the traumatized teen and said, “I fell in love with you,” before a judge gave him only two years in prison for years-long abuse that started when the kid was just 12.

Then just as Goodman was about to get sprung from jail after time served, the feds in October 2012 charged him for taking the then-15-year-old across state lines to Atlantic City, where he sodomized him and took him to dinner and a Kid Rock concert.

Goodman now faces a life sentence if convicted.

Unbelievably, the defendant, who's representing himself, argued in a motion to dismiss the case that the trip, on Valentine's Day 2010, was for his and the boy’s nuptials.

“The union resulted in a honeymoon, feasting, celebratory concert attendance,” he wrote in papers filed in Brooklyn Federal Court last week. “A "valid" "Jewish" "Wedding" and "Marriage" occurred.”

The document points out that Jewish matrimony is allowable at age 13 and does not require parental consent. It fails to mention that Jewish Law forbids same-sex relationships and it doesn’t offer proof of the so-called union.

The motion also omits the fact that when Goodman was sentenced in state court, his purported partner, who's now 18, called him “the devil disguised as a human” and “the worst thing that ever happened to me.”

The teen also said that the judge’s unexplained decision to impose the lenient sentence over prosecutors' objections is “a very grave mistake.”

But the pro se pervert still maintained that his constitutional rights are being violated because the law is “improperly applied,” acknowledging that no one has ever made such claims before.

“This is the most meshuga thing in the world,” said Rabbi Shea Hecht, who advised the victim and his family, noting that Goodman has also copped to molesting the boy’s younger brother and may have had other victims.

“His latest spin on this goes to show how sick this man is and that he's a menace to society,” Hecht said.

(Daily News)

ACLU Pushes Gay Pedophilia In Nevada

ACLU or NAMBLA

 The following is from the law suit which show the distinction between hetero and homosexual molestation.
                 sexual act                   heterosexual molestation      homosexual molestation

from the law suit

                                           

 If the homosexual molestation law is struck down, then a 75 year old man can legally seduce your 16 year old son with out any punishment.  All homosexual molestations which are currently punished with the punishment on the right, will only have the lesser punishment on the left.



The text of the law suit

article on the subject
The American Civil Liberties Union of Nevada is asking a federal court to declare unconstitutional a state law that calls consensual sex between two same-sex teenagers as "the infamous crime against nature" with a possible sentence of five years to life in prison.

The civil rights lawsuit filed on behalf of a Washoe County teen referred to as John Doe seeks just $1 in damages from Elko County and District Attorney Mark Torvinen. But it also seeks to invalidate what ACLU state legal chief Staci Pratt called a "homophobic relic" of a bygone era.

"The law says that if you are engaged in a same-sex relationship and you're between the ages of 16 and 18, you're committing a crime against nature," Pratt said Wednesday. "The law is patently unconstitutional because it treats identical conduct differently based solely on whether the sexual activity involves two persons of the same sex."

The state law makes it a felony if a person "incites, entices or solicits a minor to engage in acts which constitute the infamous crime against nature."

The lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in Reno notes that the age of heterosexual consent in Nevada is 16.
It alleges that the 17-year-old plaintiff was arrested last year in Elko on juvenile delinquency charges alleging that consensual sex he had with two other teens violated a narrow provision of state law that Pratt said criminalizes sexual contact between people who are 16 to 18 and of the same sex.

One charge was eventually dropped, and the teen pleaded guilty last November to a reduced misdemeanor charge of disorderly conduct. He was sentence to perform community service.

Pratt said the ACLU was seeking class-action status in the case because prosecutors in other Nevada counties could file similar charges under similar circumstances.

"No DA should have the power to prosecute a teenager who's above the age of consent for homosexual activity," Pratt said. "We could see this happen again and again."

The ACLU has not only joined a court right to overturn the law, but has also contacted lawmakers in Carson City to repeal the law. A news release from the ACLU says their lawsuit believes the statute is ‘unconstitutional in all of its applications. The law classifies and imposes disparate treatment based on sex and sexual orientation in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourtheenth Ammendment.”

(AP and last paragraph)

Nevada Homosexual Molestation Law, that they want to get rid of

definitions in previous law