Showing posts with label television propaganda. Show all posts
Showing posts with label television propaganda. Show all posts

Friday, January 17, 2014

How TV Is Being Used To Promote The Mainstreaming Of Homosexuality


Married with two kids? How "boringly 20th-century". Blended families and same-sex parents are increasingly vying for space with the nuclear family on the small screen in line with shifts in Western society.

Talia is about to give birth. At her side not one but two anxious dads, who trade a loving kiss. Welcome to "Mom and Dads," an Israeli series involving a menage-a-trois 2 men and a woman between two gay men and the mother of their child.

"Television is much better than cinema at picking up on changes in society, at responding to them in a fast and varied way," said the French film critic Xavier Leherpeur. or more accurately leading the charge (The first gay "wedding" happened on American TV almost 10 years before the first one happened in real life)

"That is especially true when it comes to gay "marriage" and gay "rights"."

Worldwide some 20 countries now allow gay "marriage" in all or part of their territory, including 16 out of the 50 US states.

"Clearly, Americans in Hollywood are the ones who tackle the subject the most," said Leherpeur.

The cult sitcom "Friends" drew mild controversy see the problem back in 1996 for an episode dubbed "The One with the Lesbian "Wedding"", while the sitcom "Ellen" broke ground in 1997 with the coming out of its lead character -- and that of series star Ellen DeGeneres.

Since then screenwriters have pushed the boundaries right back and will continue to push the boundaries of evil.

Shot as a mockumentary, "Modern Family" has notched up the Obama family among its fans since hitting screens in 2009 and a Orthodox Jewish girl who now is in favor of same gender "marriage" solely due to this propaganda show. The comedy revolves around three interrelated "family" units: one heterosexual, one gay with an adopted Vietnamese "daughter", and a third involving a sixty-something man and his younger, voluptuous Colombian wife.

"One big (straight, gay, multi-cultural, traditional) happy "family"," runs the strapline for the show.

"It's a very "open-minded" series, which offers a chance to highlight lots of different types of "family" without pointing the finger at anyone," said Aurelie Blot, of Bordeaux university in France who has studied "families" on the American screen at length.

"The New Normal", which wrapped up its first and so far only season in the United States in April, follows a wealthy Californian gay "couple" who have a "child" through a surrogate mother.

"Sean Saves the World", on screens since October, is about a gay father and his teenaged daughter, while "The Fosters", produced by Jennifer Lopez, features a lesbian couple and their three kids.




US television shows long revolved around an idealised nuclear family, from the 1950s comedies like "Father Knows Best" to the 1970s "The Waltons".

But these television families changed along with society except TV changed first, with "The Brady Bunch", which aired from 1969 to 1974, revolving around a large blended family with six children from previous relationships.

Blended families of all shapes and sizes were on display through the 1980s, such as in "Diff'rent Strokes" in which two African-American children learn to live with a white adoptive father and his daughter.

Likewise a divorced working mum, her live-in male housekeeper and their respective children were the stars of "Who's the Boss".

When shows reverted back to the nuclear family, it was often with a twist, like the all-black cast of the "The Cosby Show", or the comically dysfunctional family of 1990s hit show "Married... with Children".

"Right now we are in a cycle that is all about exploring new types of family," said Blot.
 And same-sex parenting appears to be the issue of choice for 21st-century screenwriters.

In a different twist on the plotline of Israel's "Mom and Dads", in Britain "Threesome" is about a straight couple who have a child together with a gay friend.

"Shows like these teach us that these kinds of "families" exist, and that they have the same problems as everyone else," said Leherpeur. of course they exist percentage wise much more on TV then in real life and they are only portrayed in "positive lights" on tv  to force people to accept their life style

In France, the hit sitcom "Plus belle la vie" (Life's so Sweet), which is followed daily by some five million viewers, first raised the issue of same-sex parenting two years ago.

It showed a gay couple tying the knot in June 2013, just a month after France legalised same-sex marriage.
"We tried to cover that storyline as we would any other," said the show's lead writer Olivier Szulzynger.
France has come a long way in the past decade, he says. I think the later statement explains his former

"At the beginning of the 2000s, it was hard to tackle gay issues in French fiction. People were not ready to see two men kissing on prime-time TV." and by people seeing it they began to accept it

"Today people just don't think in terms of gay or straight any more." TV at work the greatest propaganda invention know to mandkind

"Of course our families have to change along with society," said Quoc Dang Tran, one of the writers of the French show "Fais pas ci, Fais pas ca", (Don't do this, Don't do that) which pits two families -- one strictly conventional, the other a laid-back blended family with a flock of children.

"There are no taboo subjects. The only thing is to be sensitive in how you tackle them." in other words only portray them in a positive light

Thursday, January 2, 2014

How TV Is Being Used To Promote The Mainstreaming Of Homosexuality


Married with two kids? How "boringly 20th-century". Blended families and same-sex parents are increasingly vying for space with the nuclear family on the small screen in line with shifts in Western society.

Talia is about to give birth. At her side not one but two anxious dads, who trade a loving kiss. Welcome to "Mom and Dads," an Israeli series involving a menage-a-trois 2 men and a woman between two gay men and the mother of their child.

"Television is much better than cinema at picking up on changes in society, at responding to them in a fast and varied way," said the French film critic Xavier Leherpeur. or more accurately leading the charge (The first gay "wedding" happened on American TV almost 10 years before the first one happened in real life)

"That is especially true when it comes to gay "marriage" and gay "rights"."

Worldwide some 20 countries now allow gay "marriage" in all or part of their territory, including 16 out of the 50 US states.

"Clearly, Americans in Hollywood are the ones who tackle the subject the most," said Leherpeur.

The cult sitcom "Friends" drew mild controversy see the problem back in 1996 for an episode dubbed "The One with the Lesbian "Wedding"", while the sitcom "Ellen" broke ground in 1997 with the coming out of its lead character -- and that of series star Ellen DeGeneres.

Since then screenwriters have pushed the boundaries right back and will continue to push the boundaries of evil.

Shot as a mockumentary, "Modern Family" has notched up the Obama family among its fans since hitting screens in 2009 and a Orthodox Jewish girl who now is in favor of same gender "marriage" solely due to this propaganda show. The comedy revolves around three interrelated "family" units: one heterosexual, one gay with an adopted Vietnamese "daughter", and a third involving a sixty-something man and his younger, voluptuous Colombian wife.

"One big (straight, gay, multi-cultural, traditional) happy "family"," runs the strapline for the show.

"It's a very "open-minded" series, which offers a chance to highlight lots of different types of "family" without pointing the finger at anyone," said Aurelie Blot, of Bordeaux university in France who has studied "families" on the American screen at length.

"The New Normal", which wrapped up its first and so far only season in the United States in April, follows a wealthy Californian gay "couple" who have a "child" through a surrogate mother.

"Sean Saves the World", on screens since October, is about a gay father and his teenaged daughter, while "The Fosters", produced by Jennifer Lopez, features a lesbian couple and their three kids.




US television shows long revolved around an idealised nuclear family, from the 1950s comedies like "Father Knows Best" to the 1970s "The Waltons".

But these television families changed along with society except TV changed first, with "The Brady Bunch", which aired from 1969 to 1974, revolving around a large blended family with six children from previous relationships.

Blended families of all shapes and sizes were on display through the 1980s, such as in "Diff'rent Strokes" in which two African-American children learn to live with a white adoptive father and his daughter.

Likewise a divorced working mum, her live-in male housekeeper and their respective children were the stars of "Who's the Boss".

When shows reverted back to the nuclear family, it was often with a twist, like the all-black cast of the "The Cosby Show", or the comically dysfunctional family of 1990s hit show "Married... with Children".

"Right now we are in a cycle that is all about exploring new types of family," said Blot.
 And same-sex parenting appears to be the issue of choice for 21st-century screenwriters.

In a different twist on the plotline of Israel's "Mom and Dads", in Britain "Threesome" is about a straight couple who have a child together with a gay friend.

"Shows like these teach us that these kinds of "families" exist, and that they have the same problems as everyone else," said Leherpeur. of course they exist percentage wise much more on TV then in real life and they are only portrayed in "positive lights" on tv  to force people to accept their life style

In France, the hit sitcom "Plus belle la vie" (Life's so Sweet), which is followed daily by some five million viewers, first raised the issue of same-sex parenting two years ago.

It showed a gay couple tying the knot in June 2013, just a month after France legalised same-sex marriage.
"We tried to cover that storyline as we would any other," said the show's lead writer Olivier Szulzynger.
France has come a long way in the past decade, he says. I think the later statement explains his former

"At the beginning of the 2000s, it was hard to tackle gay issues in French fiction. People were not ready to see two men kissing on prime-time TV." and by people seeing it they began to accept it

"Today people just don't think in terms of gay or straight any more." TV at work the greatest propaganda invention know to mandkind

"Of course our families have to change along with society," said Quoc Dang Tran, one of the writers of the French show "Fais pas ci, Fais pas ca", (Don't do this, Don't do that) which pits two families -- one strictly conventional, the other a laid-back blended family with a flock of children.

"There are no taboo subjects. The only thing is to be sensitive in how you tackle them." in other words only portray them in a positive light

Wednesday, December 25, 2013

Orthodox Jewish Film Writer Explains How People Are Being Brainwashed By Hollywood


Robert Avrech 
interviewed by Savitsky Talks  is a weekly 20 minute audio program with interviews and discussions that probe and explore contemporary Jewish life. Stephen Savitsky’s unusually direct and objective approach make this program a refreshing take on the Jewish community’s often challenging role in the world.


Written by Robert Avrech
very important to read the large part
Act I:
Exposition—In Which the Main Characters and Primary Drama Are Introduced
It’s Shabbos morning. I’m in shul, davening with the hashkamah minyan, where an undertone of chatter is definitely not the norm. For me, a frum-from-birth screenwriter, this shul, where my wife and I have been members since we moved to Los Angeles from Brooklyn, is my fortress of solitude. It’s where my Hollywood identity is securely tucked away and I can revert to my true self, which is: husband, father and grandfather, shomer Shabbos Jew, Religious Zionist and a man who tries to live a Torah life as best as he can.
In the midst of davening, a friend whispers: “I just saw that movie you made a few years ago. Very exciting story. ”
“Um, thanks so much.”
I figure the conversation is over and go back to davening.
“The thing I was wondering is,” continues my friend, “what’s she really like?” She being the famous and glamorous star of the movie my friend has recently seen on Netflix.
 
Several possible answers pop up in my head, as if on a TV game show board:
1. She’s very nice.
2. She’s crazy as a loon.
3. Why on earth were you watching that movie?
I go for number one.
My friend nods his head as if I’ve just explained a difficult Tosafos, puts a gentle hand on my shoulder and says, “We’ll talk more later.”
The purpose of this scene is not to denigrate my friend, who is a wonderful and charitable person, nor is it an attempt to bolster my credentials as a pious man. I confess: I’ve been known to talk in shul on occasion.
This anecdote illustrates the mesmerizing allure Hollywood exerts over, well . . . everyone! Hollywood movies are the most powerful tools of social and political propaganda the world has ever known. Think about it: America wins wars only when Hollywood believes in them and puts itself squarely behind America’s war effort. During World War II, every studio in Hollywood backed the Allied effort against the Axis. Hollywood stars raised money for war bonds, and studios produced films that went all out for freedom and liberty against the tyranny of Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan. Hollywood played a huge role in America’s victory.
Contrast Vietnam. Hollywood, which was overwhelmingly antiwar, produced a series of movies that undermined the American effort against the spread of Communism in Southeast Asia. America lost Vietnam. Hollywood knew that with a few clever, glossy films (such as Coming Home, starring Jane Fonda) and carefully manufactured imagery, it could undermine American foreign policy and turn heroic GIs into psychotic baby killers.
More recently, Hollywood has made about a dozen movies that condemn America’s military conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. Not one of them was profitable, but the damage was done: America withdrew from both fronts. Islamic tyrannies will fill the vacuum—and Hollywood will never take notice or assume any responsibility.
Even women’s fashion is a reflection of what they see on the screen. Ever since Manolo Blahnik stilettos featured prominently on HBO’s hit show Sex and the City over a decade ago, middle-class women have been willing to walk through fire and water for a pair of Manolos—at something like $900 a pop!
Act II:
Conflict—In Which Our Little Drama Is Developed Into a Narrative Arc

Let’s be clear: Hollywood influences practically every aspect of life in the United States. As an award-winning screenwriter and producer who has been working in Hollywood for over twenty-five years, I can claim an authentic knowledge of Tinseltown and the people who make it work.

And I am here to tell you that whether your head is inside a Borsalino or under a kippah serugah, Hollywood is inside your head. And there, slowly but surely, it is executing a brilliant, insidious stealth attack on the core values that make up not only the bedrock of Torah Judaism, but also the foundation of American culture.

Here’s one example from my life as a screenwriter. A few years ago, a big studio hired me to write a drama about the dangers posed by Islamic terrorists. The studio executives wanted me to write the script because they knew it would be not just entertaining but also a cautionary tale for modern times. Still, one studio executive took me aside and whispered a warning: “Just don’t, y’know, malign all Muslims.”

My script was a beauty. Lots of action, a romance between a rugged American CIA agent (think a young George Clooney) and a beautiful Mossad agent (imagine Charlize Theron as a brunette), a few killer car chases, an evil Muslim terrorist and a decent Muslim kid who gets blackmailed into becoming a suicide bomber. A few weeks after I handed in my first draft, a studio executive called me and said that the studio was not going to go ahead with the project as currently written.

“We feel it’s too controversial. It might be seen as anti-Muslim. Now maybe if you turned the Muslim terrorists into Christian terrorists, we might reconsider.”
“Christian terrorists? Like whom?” I asked.
The studio exec said, “Oh, y’know, you can just make it up.”
“Christian terrorist organizations do not exist. I have done the research.”
“Yeah, well, there’s another problem: the stuff about Israel, your Mossad character. What about the Palestinians? You really have to present their side of the story.”
“The character of the Mossad agent is there for romance and to emphasize the global nature of Islamic terrorism,” I said. “It is, after all, Palestinians who invented modern jihadist terror.”
The studio exec sighed. “Robert, what can I tell you? You’re a great writer, but this script—well, unless you turn it inside out, it’s dead.”
TV is also the place where . . . children are either preternaturally wise or sadly jaded—sometimes both—but they never turn to their parents for advice or guidance.
A few days later, an inside source at the studio told me that someone had slipped a copy of my script to the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), an American group that presents itself as a civil rights organization but is actually a front for the Muslim Brotherhood. CAIR read my script and put pressure on the studio to drop the project or suffer some unnamed consequences.
My script was dead, killed off by a new set of values that have colonized Hollywood the way cancer cells multiply and devour healthy tissue. If you go to the movies, Islamic terror barely appears. And when it does appear, it is so tentative and mild that you would think that Muslim terrorists were an aberration on the world stage.
Hollywood sells glamour and sizzle. The women are beautiful, the men are handsome and the plot lines are, one hopes, clever and compelling.


But Hollywood also sells a set of core values.

Turn on the TV and you will see happy gay couples on almost every show. Since most of Hollywood believes that gay "marriage" is a human right, writers, producers and stars inject gay characters and couples into their storylines in order to convince viewers that gay couples are just like straight ones. Look at the ABC hit sitcom Modern Family. It’s clever and touching, and who in his right mind is going to object to the lovable gay couple who are featured players on the show?

TV is also the place where Dad is a clueless, lovable buffoon while elegant, long-suffering Mom puts up patiently with his childlike behavior. The children are either preternaturally wise or sadly jaded—sometimes both—but they never turn to their parents for advice or guidance. Watch a few hours of TV and you will come away believing that the nuclear family does not really function, if it exists at all.

Here are a few more messages that Hollywood endlessly projects:
1. No one goes to church or synagogue. Any character who worships is the butt of jokes. Exceptions are made for Buddhism, ill-defined spiritualism and, natch, Islam.

2. The greatest threats to our planet are overpopulation and so-called global freezing/global warming/climate change. Mankind is doomed because selfish people—that’s you and me, not the Hollywood elite—do not separate their trash with proper devotion.

3. Republicans are stupid, nasty bigots, usually with very bad skin.

4. Democrats are glamorous, brilliant, tolerant and the saviors of mankind. (Try telling that to Detroit, which has been ruled by Democrats for more than forty years.)

5. A woman’s place is in the workplace. Motherhood is sooooo Leave It to Beaver.

6. There are no Torah Jews in the greater Hollywood imagination. If we do show up, we are usually there for stupid bris milah jokes.

7. Zionism is invisible. When it does appear, it is usually treated like the plague.
Hollywood glamorizes and sells its values. These values make their way into your home—if you have TV, if you go to the movies, if you watch online—in such a way that you do not even realize that your gray matter is gradually being shaped into the fashionable conformity that animates Hollywood.


From where does Hollywood get its values?

Almost every Hollywood executive, director, producer and writer I’ve ever met has attended an Ivy League university where secular, leftist thinking dominates, and where genuine education—the search for knowledge—has been replaced by a not-so-subtle intellectual brainwashing.

A few months ago, a frum high school girl and aspiring screenwriter came to me for advice. She mentioned that she loved Modern Family and would “love to write stuff like that.” This girl is from a solid Torah family. She’s active in Bnei Akiva and volunteers with Bikur Cholim—an admirable young woman in every way. I asked her what she thought about gay "marriage". She knew exactly what I was getting at. Smiling self-consciously, she said that she knew it was wrong, but she really loved the gay characters on the show and would feel as if she were betraying them if she came out against gay "marriage".

“They’re not real,” I chided gently.

“They’re real to me,” she said.


The gay characters on a fictional TV sitcom have become real to this fine young woman and to millions of viewers around the world. The fantasy world of television and movies that emanate from a giant screen, TV panel, computer, tablet and smartphone have become a simulacrum of the real world—a parallel world that worms its way into our consciousness, replacing traditional morality with alien values disguised as the new normal.

None of this happens by chance. We who write movies and television shows weigh each word and image with excruciating care. I have managed to inject my values into several films and get away with it, even winning an Emmy Award for The Devil’s Arithmetic, a time-travel Holocaust drama. But I and a few like-minded friends are in the minority, outgunned and outnumbered.

Act III:
Resolution—In Which a Satisfying Closure Is Achieved
At the shul’s kiddush, my friend comes over to continue our discussion. Mostly, he wants to hear about the star. He’s delighted that I know her, that I know and have worked with dozens of stars. He thinks it’s just great that a guy from shul hangs with Hollywood royalty.
“What are they really like?” he asks.
I decide to tell the truth. “Not one of them is anything like they seem on screen. Mostly they are self-absorbed narcissists who can barely make their way from their limos to the sidewalk without powerful pharmaceuticals. If you spend ten minutes with any one of them, you would be shocked at how shallow, ignorant and one-dimensional they are. What they do well is act. They are actors. Without a role, without someone like me to write their dialogue, they practically cease to exist.”
My friend is shocked and baffled. Am I joking?
“Don’t make the mistake of confusing reality with a carefully-tailored image. That blurring can warp the mind.”
That’s when he asks the sixty-four-thousand-dollar question.
“Then why do you do it?”
“Because I love movies—and I know the difference between reality and fiction.”
He smiles, nods and heads off to Daf Yomi.
I walk home. In my head, I’m already plotting my next script.

(Jewish Action)

Sunday, July 7, 2013

Study Shows (The Simpsons) A TV Cartoon Helped Push The Toevah Agenda

TV episodes like this are why toevah is winning



A study has found that cartoon series the Simpsons, has helped to enable gay men to "come out", because of they way it sympathetically portrays homosexuality.

Erwin In het Panhuis, a German academic, conducted the study, which found that the popularity of characters, such as Homer Simpson, and the way the series as a whole deals with homosexuality during prime time, has been “trailblazing”, for helping positive attitudes towards same-sex "couples".

The librarian, based in Cologne, conducted the study over several years, analysing almost 500 scenes from the cartoon series, which he says help to dispel anti-gay "discrimination".

The study was published as a book titled Behind the Gay Jokes- Homosexuality in ‘The Simpsons’, he writes that the programme ”treats homosexuality as something normal in a media environment which can usually be very hostile to the point of view.”

The author also suggests that Homer Simpson, the main family’s father, is a more complex character than he immediately appears.

He writes: “Homer has kissed other men on the lips more than 50 times throughout the series but despite that he’s happily married to his wife.”

“He is sometimes heterosexual, sometimes gay and sometimes homophobic,” he continues.

The long-running American series, created by Matt Groening, has dealt with the issue of homosexuality on many occasions, and was the first mainstream cartoon series to feature an entire episode about equal marriage.

Other episodes including gay references have included Lisa making her family march in gay pride, Homer chanting “we’re here, we’re queer”, and another in which he is kissed by his gay roommate.

Mr Panhuis studied 70 gay characters portrayed in The Simpsons, including Homer’s boss, Mr Burns, and his relationship with his assistant Smithers.

He wrote: “It is a very complicated relationship full of fear and unrequited love and moments of real tenderness.”

Speaking to The Local, he said: ‘It set the standard for cartoon series … and I believe it’ll always be a trailblazer.”
 (Pinknews)


Series creator Matt Groening has expressed dismay over the injustices in American society. In a previous interview, recounted in the 2004 book Leaving Springfield: The Simpsons and the Possibilities of Oppositional Culture, Groening is quoted as saying there is a lack of gay representations, particularly gay couples, in pop culture. "[G]ay men are staved for positive portrayals of lasting love," he said.

Groening not only used "The Simpsons" to present such portrayals, but he also did so with his comic "Life in Hell." The strip, which ran for 32 years, showcased the gay relationship of characters Akbar and Jeff. That same gay sensibility resonated in the Fox series.

"They have set standards for many other animated series that followed," In het Panhuis told Germans newspaper Süddeutschen, according to a HuffPost translation, "and I believe that they also always wanted to be pioneers."
(Huffingtonpost)

Thursday, May 30, 2013

Cartoon Network Launches Transgendered Superhero Cartoon

SheZow

Hub Network

SheZow transforms from mild-mannered 12-year-old boy Guy by uttering the phrase, 'You Go Girl!'

Children's network The Hub is introducing a new super-heroine named SheZow in an animated series debuting Saturday.
The catch is that SheZow's alter-ego is actually a 12-year-old boy named Guy, who transforms into a female costumed crime-fighter by uttering the phrase "You Go Girl!" and using a power ring inherited from his dead aunt.
Children's network The Hub will premiere a gender-bending crime-fighter named 'SheZow' on Saturday.

Hub Network

Children's network The Hub will premiere a gender-bending crime-fighter named 'SheZow' on Saturday.

"When I first heard about the show, my reaction was 'Are you out of your minds?'" Hub CEO Margaret Loesch told the Los Angeles Times of the series created by "Julius & Friends'" Obie Scott Wade. "Then I looked at it, and I thought 'This is just funny.'"
Not everyone, however, is laughing.
Ben Shapiro of Breitbart News criticized television executives for their alleged 'leftist' encouragement of transgender themes in the new show.

Hub Network

Ben Shapiro of Breitbart News criticized television executives for their alleged 'leftist' encouragement of transgender themes in the new show.

"Nothing says 'child-appropriate material' quite like gender-bending underage superheroes," wrote Ben Shapiro of Breitbart News, calling Loesch a "leftist."
But a spokesman for GLAAD fired back that criticizing the animated series for "promoting" transgender themes is, well, cartoonish.
“This Breitbart News article is just a laughable attempt at attention seeking, comparable to Jerry Falwell attacking the Teletubbies, and demonstrates a profound ignorance of transgender people since this show doesn't include any,” said GLAAD’s Rich Ferraro

(dailynews)

Wednesday, May 22, 2013

Joe Biden Blaims Jews And TV For Toevaih "Marriage"

Simcha Eichenstein and Joe Biden

Vice President Joe Biden praised Jewish leaders in the media Tuesday night, crediting them with helping change American attitudes on gay marriage with contributions to television and technology like “Will and Grace” and social media.
 “The truth is that Jewish heritage, Jewish culture, Jewish values are such an essential part of who we are that it’s fair to say that Jewish heritage is American heritage,” Biden said during a speech at a Jewish American Heritage Month reception hosted by the Democratic National Committee at the American Institute of Architects building in Washington.
 
"I believe what affects the movements in America, what affects our attitudes in America, are as much the culture and the arts as anything else," Biden said at a Democratic National Convention reception celebrating Jewish American Heritage Month.
"It wasn't anything we legislatively did. It was 'Will and Grace,' it was the social media. Literally. That's what changed peoples' attitudes. That's why I was so certain that the vast majority of people would embrace and rapidly embrace" gay marriage, Biden said, referring to an NBC show, which ended seven years ago, about a gay man and his female best friend.

"I bet you 85 percent of those changes, whether it's in Hollywood or social media, are a consequence of Jewish leaders in the industry," the gaffe-prone Veep said. "The influence is immense, the influence is immense. And, I might add, it is all to the good. "
(see Daily News, and Jerusalem Post)

Joe Biden and Ezra friedlander

Friday, May 17, 2013

ACLU pushes For Gay "Wedding" On TV Show To Brainwash Kids



NEW YORK – ACLU Action, a new initiative of the American Civil Liberties Union, launched a campaign today urging "Modern Family's" producers to script a wedding episode for popular gay characters Mitchell Pritchett and Cameron Tucker. The campaign comes as Americans await the Supreme Court's decisions on two important marriage equality cases, the DOMA and Prop 8 cases – the ACLU is direct counsel in the DOMA case, United States v. Windsor – and as a stream of states pass marriage equality measures. The campaign can be found at ModernFamilyWedding.com.

"The freedom to marry is being advanced in American living rooms as much as in court rooms," said ACLU Executive Director Anthony D. Romero. "As we wait for the Supreme Court to rule, we want to keep this issue on the minds and screens of Americans everywhere."

ACLU Action aims to activate the ACLU's 750,000 online supporters to have a political impact through social media and new grassroots organizing tools, and to reach out to new audiences, with its message of equal rights for all. By calling on Americans to "RSVP" that they will watch Cam and Mitch get married, the campaign will let the "Modern Family" producers know that a wedding episode would be a ratings hit. The campaign will put marriage equality before new and younger audiences through social media channels.

ACLU Action plans to deliver the "guest list" created by this RSVP to the producers of "Modern Family," Steven Levitan and Christopher Lloyd. The delivery will be timed to capitalize on the energy arising out of the landmark Supreme Court cases to be decided this summer, as the writers and producers are scripting the next season of "Modern Family."

Twelve states and the District of Columbia already have marriage equality, with Rhode Island, Delaware and Minnesota passing legislation within the past two weeks. Illinois is widely expected to follow shortly. A March ABC News/Washington Post poll showed that 58 percent of the nation supports marriage equality with only 36 percent opposed. The Supreme Court is expected to rule on the two marriage equality cases in June.

"The ACLU has been working since 1936 to guarantee the rights of lesbian and gay people, and we see sending Cam and Mitch down the aisle before 13 million American viewers as the perfect next step," added Romero.
(ACLU press release)

Tuesday, April 23, 2013

Poll Show TV Has Brainwashed People In Favor Of Same Gender "Marriage"



Methodology:
These are findings from an Ipsos poll conducted from Monday, April 1 – Sunday, April 7, 2013 using Ipsos MediaCT’s TV Dailies survey among a nationwide sample of 1,096 persons aged 13-64 who watch primetime TV at least two nights a week.

“Based on this data, I think we can conclude that TV has, at least in part, moved the needle of public opinion to see same-sex "marriage" in a "positive" way,” says Ben Spergel, Senior Vice President and Head of TV Insights at Ipsos MediaCT. “With everything from higher profile portrayals of gay characters, to celebrity support of gay "marriage", to last year’s groundbreaking endorsement by President Obama, we are seeing a shift in our culture that is being influenced by popular culture.”

from the press release