“In response to the decisions announced today by the United States
Supreme Court with reference to the federal Defense of Marriage Act and
California’s Proposition 8, we reiterate the historical position of the
Jewish faith, enunciated unequivocally in our Bible, Talmud and Codes,
which forbids homosexual relationships and condemns the
institutionalization of such relationships as marriages. Our religion is
emphatic in defining marriage as a relationship between a man and a
woman. Our beliefs in this regard are unalterable. up to here I like At the same time, we
note that Judaism teaches respect for others and we condemn
discrimination against individuals. I don't remember this gemara
We are grateful that we live in a democratic society, in which all
religions are free to express their opinions about social issues and to
advocate vigorously for those opinions. The reason we opt to express our
viewpoint in a public forum is because we believe that our Divine
system of law not only dictates our beliefs and behaviors, but also
represents a system of universal morality, and therefore can stake a
claim in the national discourse. That morality, expressed in what has
broadly been labeled Judeo-Christian ethics, has long had a place in
American law and jurisprudence.
We also recognize that no religion has the right to dictate its
beliefs to the entire body politic and we do not expect that secular law
will always align with our viewpoint. Ultimately, decisions on social
policy remain with the democratic process, and today the process has
spoken and we accord the process and its result the utmost respect.and if chas veshalom the gays win in their move to ban bris Milah would you also "respect" the results? Speaking of process, legally this easily ranks as the worst supreme court decision ever. Over 1000 people voted on the (5th) amendment that was cited in the court decision, Yet not only would not a single person from amongst them (including it's writers) agree with the interpretation of the Supreme Court, not a single one of them would have even agreed with same gender "marriage"!
The Orthodox Union is proud to assert its beliefs and principles in
the public forum, and will continue to do so in a manner that is
tolerant and respectful of all of our nation’s citizens except Orthodox Jews, but which is
also authentically based upon our sacred ancient texts and time-honored
traditions.” at least for most of the first paragraph!
(Orthodox Union)
Showing posts with label pandering. Show all posts
Showing posts with label pandering. Show all posts
Thursday, June 27, 2013
Monday, June 17, 2013
Lesbian Quinn Goes To An Orthodox Shul On Friday Night
Attorney General Eric Schneiderman accompanied Christine Quinn to Orthodox Shul on the Upper West Side Ohev Tzedek. I do not know whether or not she got official approval from the Shul to show up, or if she even got any official acknowledgment that she was there. It's also unclear if she used this opportunity to preach to Orthodox Jews about her "wife" like she did in Flatbush. It is clear that for some reason she seems to be targeting the Orthodox Jewish community as of late (that makes zero political sense in terms of getting her elected) . However It's clear to anybody with any sense that she only cares about our communities opposition to toevah, and by showing up for meaningless appearances she will lessen the Jewish communities opposition to toevah.
Friday, June 14, 2013
Anti Bris Milah Group To March Once Again In NY's Gay "Pride" Parade
![]() |
| Anti Bris Milah Group In Gay "pride" Parade (See the Child) |
NYC Pride Parade Contingent - New York, New York
Event Dates: June 30, 2013 - 9:30am - 2:00pm
Event Details
see the video of last year's march
Will any politician condemn this group or the toeviah "pride" parade that allowed them to march (they only march in gay "pride parade")?
Will Christine Quinn and Bill De Blasio openly support the group to ban Bris Milah because there gay.
Will Anthony Weiner who seemed to be in agreement with Erick Salgado about the movement to ban Bris Milah, (and thus didn't seem to care about the "New York's gay "pride parade" line because he "understood" the context) continue to pander to the LGBT "community", or was he really only pandering to our community, and will defend the toevah parade's decision to allow anti Bris Milah groups to march, and attack anyone who wants to defend Bris Milah by mentioning that the threat is serious because they march every year in New York's gay "pride" parade.
- “Anthony did not understand Reverend Salgado’s remarks,” wrote Barbara Morgan, Weiner’s spokeswoman, in an email. “He did applaud Speaker Quinn’s response because he agreed with it.” (gaycitynews)
Some politicians who marched in last years gay pride parade were NY Governor Andrew Cuomo, Senators Chuck Schumer and Kirsten Gillibrand, Congressman Jerrold Nadler, Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney, and Mayoral Candidates Christine Quinn, and Bill DeBlasio. Though he couldn't march personally Daniel Squadron Williamsburg's State Senator and NYC Public Advocate Candidate sent representatives to march in his place!
Labels:
Anthony Weiner,
bill de blasio,
Bill deBlasio,
bris mila ban,
Bris Milah,
Christine Quinn,
circumcision,
Daniel Squadron,
gay Pride Parade,
intactivists,
ny gay pride parade,
pandering,
Quinn,
Weiner
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)


