Showing posts with label cuomo. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cuomo. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 19, 2015

Cuomo Comes To Yeshiva, Children Brainwashed, Hayon Successfully Protests

Why are we having 8 year olds posing with Cuomo? keep children away from politicians especially scumbags



Is there a difference between these way children act for Cuomo and public school Children over a baseball player?

We are training our kids to worship politicians as celebrities?


After getting this advertisement for this event, Joseph Hayon upset over the word "honored" gave out flyers outside of Sharai Torah against honoring Cuomo
Sharai Torah invitation 

After receiving some of Hayon's flyers before the event, a few parents decided to skip the event, showing even 1 person can have a major impact



Hayon's Flyer

Wednesday, April 1, 2015

Bill de Blasio To Ban NYC Travel To Indiana

Cuomo, de Blasio ban official travel to Indiana following state's adoption of religious freedom act

(amny) highlights our additions

How can Pinny Ringel (917) 417-3283 and Avi Fink justify working for a mayor with policies such as these!

Where are our Orthodox Legislators publicly supporting Indiana's law?

Former "Orthodox" Assemblyman Ryan Karben, Defends Cuomo's Attack On Jewish Religious Liberty

Former "Orthodox" Assemblyman Ryan Karben Defends Cuomo's Attack On Jewish Religious Liberty
Ryan Karben's attack on religon 

I think Ryan's just upset that the bill wouldn't allow him to molest his male interns


Text of bill that Karben loathes that only protects freedom of religion, and not molesting his male interns
SENATE ENROLLED ACT No. 101
AN ACT to amend the Indiana Code concerning civil procedure.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Indiana:
SECTION1.IC34-13-9 IS ADDED TO THE INDIANA CODE AS A NEW CHAPTER TO READ AS FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2015]:
Chapter 9. Religious Freedom Restoration
Sec. 1. This chapter applies to all governmental entity statutes, ordinances, resolutions, executive or administrative orders, regulations, customs, and usages, including the implementation or application thereof, regardless of whether they were enacted, adopted, or initiated before, on, or after July 1, 2015.
Sec. 2. A governmental entity statute, ordinance, resolution, executive or administrative order, regulation, custom, or usage may not be construed to be exempt from the application of this chapter unless a state statute expressly exempts the statute, ordinance, resolution, executive or administrative order, regulation, custom, or usage from the application of this chapter by citation to this chapter.
Sec. 3. (a) The following definitions apply throughout this section: (1) "Establishment Clause" refers to the part of the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States or the Constitution of the State of Indiana prohibiting laws respecting the establishment of religion. (2) "Granting", used with respect to government funding, benefits, or exemptions, does not include the denial of government funding, benefits, or exemptions. (b) This chapter may not be construed to affect, interpret, or in any way address the Establishment Clause. (c) Granting government funding, benefits, or exemptions, to the extent permissible under the Establishment Clause, does not constitute a violation of this chapter.
Sec. 4. As used in this chapter, "demonstrates"means meets the burdens of going forward with the evidence and of persuasion.
Sec. 5. As used in this chapter, "exercise of religion" includes any exercise of religion,whether or not compelled by, or central to, a system of religious belief.
Sec. 6. As used in this chapter, "governmental entity" includes the whole or any part of a branch, department, agency, instrumentality, official, or other individual or entity acting under color of law of any of the following: (1) State government. (2) A political subdivision (as defined in IC 36-1-2-13). (3) An instrumentality of a governmental entity described in subdivision(1) or (2), including a state educational institution, a body politic, a body corporate and politic, or any other similar entity established by law.
Sec. 7. As used in this chapter, "person" includes the following: (1) An individual. (2) An organization, a religious society, a church, a body of communicants, or a group organized and operated primarily for religious purposes. (3) A partnership, a limited liability company, a corporation, a company, a firm, a society, a joint-stock company, an unincorporated association, or another entity that: (A) may sue and be sued; and (B) exercises practices that are compelled or limited by a system of religious belief held by: (i) an individual; or (ii) the individuals; who have control and substantial ownership of the entity, regardless of whether the entity is organized and operated for profit or nonprofit purposes.
Sec. 8. (a) Except as provided in subsection (b), a governmental entity may not substantially burden a person's exercise of religion, even if the burden results from a rule of general applicability. (b) A governmental entity may substantially burden a person's exercise of religion only if the governmental entity demonstrates that application of the burden to the person: (1) is in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest; and (2) is the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling governmental interest.
Sec. 9. A person whose exercise of religion has been substantially burdened, or is likely to be substantially burdened, by a violation of this chapter may assert the violation or impending violation as a claim or defense in a judicial or administrative proceeding, regardless of whether the state or any other governmental entity is a party to the proceeding. If the relevant governmental entity is not a party to the proceeding, the governmental entity has an unconditional right to intervene in order to respond to the person's invocation of this chapter.
Sec. 10. (a) If a court or other tribunal in which a violation of this chapter is asserted in conformity with section 9 of this chapter determines that: (1) the person's exercise of religion has been substantially burdened, or is likely to be substantially burdened; and (2) the governmental entity imposing the burden has not demonstrated that application of the burden to the person: (A) is in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest; and (B) is the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling governmental interest; the court or other tribunal shall allow a defense against any party and shall grant appropriate relief against the governmental entity. (b) Relief against the governmental entity may include any of the following: (1) Declaratory relief or an injunction or mandate that prevents, restrains, corrects, or abates the violation of this chapter. (2) Compensatory damages. (c) In the appropriate case,the court or other tribunal also may award all or part of the costs of litigation, including reasonable attorney's fees, to a person that prevails against the governmental entity under this chapter.
Sec. 11. This chapter is not intended to, and shall not be construed or interpreted to, create a claim or private cause of action against any private employer by any applicant, employee, or former employee.

Tuesday, March 31, 2015

Because Indiana Protects Religious Rights, Governor Cuomo Bans State Travel There


"Today, I direct all agencies, departments, boards and commissions to immediately review all requests for state funded or state sponsored travel to the State of Indiana and to bar any such publicly funded travel that is not essential to the enforcement of state law or public health and safety. The ban on publicly funded travel shall take effect immediately.

"New York State has been, and will continue to be, a leader in ensuring that all LGBT persons enjoy full and equal civil rights. With this action, we stand by our LBGT family members, friends and colleagues to ensure that their rights are respected."
Andrew Cuomo

How can David Lobl rationalize working as a Jewish Liaison For Andrew Cuomo, who has policies such as this?


Text of bill that Cuomo loathes that only protects freedom of religion
SENATE ENROLLED ACT No. 101
AN ACT to amend the Indiana Code concerning civil procedure.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Indiana:
SECTION1.IC34-13-9 IS ADDED TO THE INDIANA CODE AS A NEW CHAPTER TO READ AS FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2015]:
Chapter 9. Religious Freedom Restoration
Sec. 1. This chapter applies to all governmental entity statutes, ordinances, resolutions, executive or administrative orders, regulations, customs, and usages, including the implementation or application thereof, regardless of whether they were enacted, adopted, or initiated before, on, or after July 1, 2015.
Sec. 2. A governmental entity statute, ordinance, resolution, executive or administrative order, regulation, custom, or usage may not be construed to be exempt from the application of this chapter unless a state statute expressly exempts the statute, ordinance, resolution, executive or administrative order, regulation, custom, or usage from the application of this chapter by citation to this chapter.
Sec. 3. (a) The following definitions apply throughout this section: (1) "Establishment Clause" refers to the part of the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States or the Constitution of the State of Indiana prohibiting laws respecting the establishment of religion. (2) "Granting", used with respect to government funding, benefits, or exemptions, does not include the denial of government funding, benefits, or exemptions. (b) This chapter may not be construed to affect, interpret, or in any way address the Establishment Clause. (c) Granting government funding, benefits, or exemptions, to the extent permissible under the Establishment Clause, does not constitute a violation of this chapter.
Sec. 4. As used in this chapter, "demonstrates"means meets the burdens of going forward with the evidence and of persuasion.
Sec. 5. As used in this chapter, "exercise of religion" includes any exercise of religion,whether or not compelled by, or central to, a system of religious belief.
Sec. 6. As used in this chapter, "governmental entity" includes the whole or any part of a branch, department, agency, instrumentality, official, or other individual or entity acting under color of law of any of the following: (1) State government. (2) A political subdivision (as defined in IC 36-1-2-13). (3) An instrumentality of a governmental entity described in subdivision(1) or (2), including a state educational institution, a body politic, a body corporate and politic, or any other similar entity established by law.
Sec. 7. As used in this chapter, "person" includes the following: (1) An individual. (2) An organization, a religious society, a church, a body of communicants, or a group organized and operated primarily for religious purposes. (3) A partnership, a limited liability company, a corporation, a company, a firm, a society, a joint-stock company, an unincorporated association, or another entity that: (A) may sue and be sued; and (B) exercises practices that are compelled or limited by a system of religious belief held by: (i) an individual; or (ii) the individuals; who have control and substantial ownership of the entity, regardless of whether the entity is organized and operated for profit or nonprofit purposes.
Sec. 8. (a) Except as provided in subsection (b), a governmental entity may not substantially burden a person's exercise of religion, even if the burden results from a rule of general applicability. (b) A governmental entity may substantially burden a person's exercise of religion only if the governmental entity demonstrates that application of the burden to the person: (1) is in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest; and (2) is the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling governmental interest.
Sec. 9. A person whose exercise of religion has been substantially burdened, or is likely to be substantially burdened, by a violation of this chapter may assert the violation or impending violation as a claim or defense in a judicial or administrative proceeding, regardless of whether the state or any other governmental entity is a party to the proceeding. If the relevant governmental entity is not a party to the proceeding, the governmental entity has an unconditional right to intervene in order to respond to the person's invocation of this chapter.
Sec. 10. (a) If a court or other tribunal in which a violation of this chapter is asserted in conformity with section 9 of this chapter determines that: (1) the person's exercise of religion has been substantially burdened, or is likely to be substantially burdened; and (2) the governmental entity imposing the burden has not demonstrated that application of the burden to the person: (A) is in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest; and (B) is the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling governmental interest; the court or other tribunal shall allow a defense against any party and shall grant appropriate relief against the governmental entity. (b) Relief against the governmental entity may include any of the following: (1) Declaratory relief or an injunction or mandate that prevents, restrains, corrects, or abates the violation of this chapter. (2) Compensatory damages. (c) In the appropriate case,the court or other tribunal also may award all or part of the costs of litigation, including reasonable attorney's fees, to a person that prevails against the governmental entity under this chapter.
Sec. 11. This chapter is not intended to, and shall not be construed or interpreted to, create a claim or private cause of action against any private employer by any applicant, employee, or former employee.

Thursday, January 8, 2015

Agudah Praises Andrew Cuomo's "Outstanding Leadership Abilities"

Statement from Agudath Israel of America Upon the Passing of Governor Mario Cuomo


Agudath Israel of America notes with sadness the passing of Governor Mario Cuomo.

Throughout his tenure as Governor of the State of New York, Mario Cuomo displayed great friendship to the Jewish community, and played a leadership role in addressing many issues of Jewish concern.

Governor Cuomo enjoyed a close working relationship, and an especially warm personal relationship, with the late president of Agudath Israel, Rabbi Moshe Sherer. Rabbi Sherer befriended Mario Cuomo even before Mr. Cuomo was elected to public office, and the bonds of friendship grew only stronger with the passing years. Their relationship translated into a number of tangible benefits for the Orthodox Jewish community as a whole and for needy members of the community as individuals.

Governor Cuomo had the historic distinction of being the only high ranking American elected official ever to meet with Agudath Israel's Moetzes Gedolei HaTorah (Council of Torah Sages). His deep respect for the senior rabbis, and his willingness to engage them in dialogue on major issues of public policy, set him apart from his contemporaries in the political world.

Agudath Israel extends its deep sympathies and sincere condolences to the Cuomo family, including Governor Andrew Cuomo, who has clearly inherited many of his father's outstanding leadership abilities. May Mario Cuomo's exceptional human qualities continue to serve as a source of inspiration for the family, and for all who aspire to public service in the most noble sense of the term.

(Aguda press release)

"Leadership ability" of twisting arms into passing the most evil legislation in NY history
Was there even a reason to mention Andrew in this piece?

PS: I agree that Andrew did "inherit" much from his father, like his unrelenting push for the evil of liberalism despite the obstacles like Mario did with abortion, and capital punishment.

Monday, December 22, 2014

Medicaid Will Now Cover Sex "Change" Operations In NY

new proposed regulations


"Treatments" for gender dysphoria, including sex reassignment surgery and hormone therapy, could soon be covered under New York's Medicaid program, according to aproposed rule from the state's Department of Health.

If the rule is adopted, New York would become the fifth state to allow its Medicaid program to pay for "therapies" that not long ago were considered experimental by some and deviant by others.

The state's Medicaid program will cover hormone therapy and surgery for those 18 years of age and older and for people who have been living for at least a year in a gender role that is "congruent" with their gender identity, the posting said.

The program will not cover reversal of prior surgeries and some cosmetic procedures, according to the proposed rule, which was posted one week after Governor Andrew Cuomo announced New York's private insurance companies will no longer be allowed to deny coverage for transgender New Yorkers.

While the move is a win for LGBT proponents who have been pushing for this for years, some advocates expressed regret that certain services may not be covered.

"This is a terrific step in the right direction," said Michael Silverman, executive director of the Transgender Legal Defense & Education Fund. "I think there is a bit more work to do."

Silverman was particularly concerned with the state's decision not to cover certain procedures such as breast augmentation or drugs that promote hair growth or loss.

These may seem cosmetic, but could also be essential for mental health, he said.

"Medical necessity and not an arbitrary list of procedures should be the touchstone for whether coverage is available," Silverman said.

New York State continues settlement negotiations in a class action lawsuit brought by patients seeking coverage through Medicaid.

Kim Forte, supervising attorney for the Legal Aid Society LGBT law and policy initiative, said they want the regulations to be finalized before they are comfortable settling with the Cuomo administration.

"We haven't settled the case because we want the public comment period to run it course," Forte said. "There needs to be guidance issued to the private insurers contracting with Medicaid. We expect to see that guidance as part of settlement litigation."

There is also a hope from some that the age requirements may be changed.

“After years of advocacy, we’re thrilled that transgender New Yorkers will finally be able to access medically necessary health care through Medicaid,” Nathan Schaefer, executive director of Empire State Pride Agenda, said in a press release. “The news of this long-awaited regulatory change will mean that Medicaid can longer discriminate against what the American Medical Association, the American Psychological Association the World Professional Association of Transgender Health and many other organizations agree is critical care that should not be denied. We’re hopeful subsequent iterations of this policy will be fully inclusive of all care and for all ages, as this change does not apply to all services nor to those under the age of 18.”

The move is expected to cost the state $6.7 million, a figure arrived at by taking the number of Medicaid recipients now receiving mental health services for gender dysphoria—353 natal males and 308 natal females—and then estimating how many of those would seek some sort of therapy.

"New York State has always been a progressive leader and ensuring that all New Yorkers—regardless of gender identity—are treated fairly will continue this legacy," Cuomo said in a statement. "This new regulation will guarantee transgender New Yorkers access to Medicaid-funded care, which is critical to safeguarding the principle or equal treatment. I am proud that the state is taking this step and continuing to lead the fight on transgender rights."

The state prohibited payment for gender reassignment surgery through Medicaid in 1998, a position adopted because "there was a lack of consensus regarding the safety and efficacy" of the procedure, the state register said.

“Since that time, a body of credible medical evidence has been developed supporting the conclusion that GRS (gender reassignment surgery) is a safe and effective treatment for gender dysphoria in medically necessary cases, and is no longer considered experimental,” the proposed rule states. “Significantly, in May of 2014, the federal government through the Departmental Appeals Board of the Department of Health and Human Services ruled that Medicare could no longer deny coverage of GRS on the grounds that it is ineffective, unsafe, experimental, or controversial, that it has a high rate of complication or has not been subjected to controlled, long-term studies, or that the criteria for diagnosing gender dysphoria is inconsistent or problematic.”

The new regulation is subject to a 45-day comment period before it can take effect.



Gov. Cuomo approved a new policy Tuesday night allowing impoverished transgender New Yorkers to bill taxpayers for sex-change surgery.

The Cuomo administration issued new rules requiring New York’s highest-in-the-nation $55 billion Medicaid program — the government health-insurance program for the needy — to foot the bill for “gender reassignment” operations.

State officials estimate the expanded coverage for transgender operations and services will cost the Medicaid program $6.7 million a year.

There are 353 men and 308 women on Medicaid who have been diagnosed with gender-identify disorder.

The state Department of Health estimated that a portion of these individuals will seek either hormone therapy or reassignment surgery.

The cost for sex-change operations — which include testicle removal, breast augmentation and mastectomy — ranges from $15,000 to $50,000. That doesn’t include thousands of dollars in therapy and counseling services.

Medicaid will pick up the tab for transgender New Yorkers who are over 18, although the patients must be 21 to get surgery that results in sterilization.

‎“New York state has always been a progressive leader and ensuring that all New Yorkers — regardless of gender identity — are treated fairly will continue this legacy,” Cuomo said.

“This new regulation will guarantee transgender New Yorkers access to Medicaid-funded care, which is critical to safeguarding the principle of equal treatment,” he said.

“I am proud that the state is taking this step and continuing to lead the fight on transgender rights.”

New York joins ‎ Oregon, Massachusetts, Vermont, Washington, DC, and Maryland in offering "medical" services to transgender residents.

But Republican leaders slammed Cuomo’s move as outrageous.

“Sometimes you just have to say ‘no,’ and this is clearly one of them,” said Westchester County Executive Rob Astorino.

“New Yorkers pay the highest ‎property taxes in America because our Medicaid costs already are through the roof, Putting taxpayers on the hook for sex change operations when they often struggle to pay for their own basic health-care needs is ridiculous, no matter how it’s spun,” he said.

State Sen. Martin Golden (R-Brooklyn) predicted the Medicaid costs for sex-change operations will be much higher.

The state is saying it will cost $67 million over ten years. It will be over $100 million. It’s an inappropriate use of taxpayer dollars,” Golden said.

Cuomo’s move also will make it easier for foster-care residents in the city’s care who identify as transgender to get sex-reassignment surgery through Medicaid. The city — as well as the state — has been sued for discrimination after refusing to pay for such services.

“We look forward to working with the State in the implementation and roll out of these "critical" and "lifesaving" health care provisions for the transgender community,” Speaker Melissa Mark Viverito and the Council’s LGBT Caucus said in a join statement.

“We applaud the Cuomo administration for taking this important step,” said Michael Silverman, director of the Transgender Legal Defense & Education Policy. “New York is poised to become a model state when it comes to the protection of its transgender residents.”

But Silverman objected to Cuomo limiting the transgender services to adults while continuing to exclude youths.

(NY Post)

Thursday, December 11, 2014

Cuomo Orders All Insurance Companies To Cover Sex "Change" Operations

Insurers in New York Must Cover Gender Reassignment Surgery, Cuomo who the "Orthodox" Jewish community just voted for  Says




Lee Albertorio felt like a man trapped in a woman’s body. After serving in the Air Force, she began taking hormones, which deepened heris voice and made heris physique more masculine.

SHe changed heris passport to reflect that heris was posing as a male, and last year she decided to have a mastectomy, known as top surgery. But heris insurance company told heris the operation was cosmetic and refused to cover it, she said Wednesday.

Now Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo YMS who won the "Orthodox" Jewish vote in almost every single Jewish ED is warning insurance companies that they will no longer be allowed to deny gender reassignment surgery or other treatment to change a person’s gender, like hormone therapy, if a doctor has deemed that treatment "medically necessary".

In a letter being sent to insurance companies this week, the governor said that because state law requires insurance coverage for the diagnosis and treatment of psychological disorders, people who are found to have a psychological mismatch between their birth sex and their internal sense of gender are entitled to expensive insurance coverage for treatments related to that condition, called gender dysphoria. making everyone else's premiums rise significantly

“An issuer of a policy that includes coverage for mental health conditions may not exclude coverage for the diagnosis and treatment of gender dysphoria,” the governor’s letter says.

“That would change everything — I mean that sounds very good,” Mrs. Albertorio said excitedly when told of the governor’s order.

The rule makes New York the ninth state to require the coverage, the Transgender Legal Defense and Education Fund, an advocacy group, said on Wednesday. The others are California, Colorado, Connecticut, Illinois, Massachusetts, Oregon, Vermont and Washington, according to the group. Washington, D.C., also mandates it.

The group said that most insurance policies currently exclude coverage for transgender treatment, and at best include it as a more expensive rider to a standard plan.

“This is an absolute sea change in the way that insurance for transgender people will cover their health care needs,” Michael Silverman, executive director of the fund, said. “This essentially opens up an entire world of treatment for transgender people that was closed to them previously.”
Leslie Moran, a spokeswoman for the New York Health Plan Association, the trade association for most health plans across New York State, said the industry did not object to having to cover gender dysphoria.

But she said the industry was concerned that the governor’s order could raise costs in the new year that are going to be transferred over to you that were not contemplated during the recent round of rate-setting. And she said companies were concerned that the policy would open the door for other services that people might seek, claiming they were medically necessary for mental health reasons.

“It sets a precedent,” Ms. Moran said.

Benjamin M. Lawsky, the state’s superintendent of financial services, which regulates insurance, said he would “be very surprised” if the change led to a noticeable after all an extra few dollars a month is not that noticeable and "doesn't" add up rise in insurance premiums, because the number of transgender people would be such a small part of the insurance pool.

“It will further solidify the rights of a group that probably weren’t always being treated as equal to everybody else, and that’s sort of fundamental to our system,” Mr. Lawsky said.

The new policy comes as the state is trying to negotiate a settlement in a class-action lawsuit seeking Medicaid coverage for sex-change treatments, and advocates said they hoped it was a signal that the state was going to approve that coverage as well. Mr. Lawsky said that State Senator Brad Hoylman YMS, a Manhattan Democrat, had brought the issue to his attention in June, by pointing out that several other states had barred insurance companies from excluding gender-change treatment.

At that time, a review board of the United States Department of Health and Human Services had just ruled that transgender people could no longer be automatically denied coverage for sex reassignment surgeries under Medicare, reversing a policy in place since 1981.

Mr. Hoylman said this week that he knew people who had had to scrape together money from fund-raisers to pay for their gender reassignment surgery. “Nobody should be in that position in order to embrace such a fundamental aspect of their personhood,” he said.

Mr. Hoylman said he was hoping the governor’s directive signaled that the political climate was right to pass a “transgender civil rights act” in the state, guaranteeing that transgender people would not suffer discrimination in other areas like housing and forcing them into all Jewish Stores, and allowing men into women's bathrooms and the like.

Mrs. Albertorio, 30, a program coordinator at a nonprofit agency, wanted the top surgery so badly that she paid for it using $6,500 in loans and credit card payments. To complete heris transition will cost at least $50,000, which for heris is “pretty out of reach and therefore is going to be transferred to you”.
(NYT) highlight portions our additions
Letter that was sent out forcing theses changes



Cuomo's official statement (highlighted portion is necessary additions)
Department of Financial Services Notifies Insurance Industry That Medically Necessary Treatment For Gender Dysphoria Cannot be Denied



Governor Andrew M. Cuomo today announced that regulatory guidance has been issued to help ensure that transgender New Yorkers have equal access to commercial health insurance coverage. The Department of Financial Services (DFS) today sent industry guidance to all New York insurers stating that they may not deny medically necessary treatment for gender dysphoria – a condition when a person's gender at birth is contrary to the one with which they identify.

“Respecting the rights and dignity of all New Yorkers is paramount unless your religious,” Governor Cuomo said. “By taking this action, we are ensuring that principle rightfully extends to transgender people across our state and continuing New York’s legacy as a progressive leader for the nation. I urge other states to follow our example on this issue, because "discriminating" against people on the basis of their gender identity simply should not be tolerated.”

Benjamin M. Lawsky, Superintendent of Financial Services, said, “We hope this action sends a powerful message that "discrimination" against transgender people will not be tolerated. Transgender New Yorkers deserve the same access to "essential" health care as every other New Yorker. We especially thank Senator Brad Hoylman for working with us on this matter and for his steadfast leadership on LGBT rights and assisted murder.”

Senator Brad Hoylman said, “I commend Governor Cuomo and Superintendent Lawsky for ending "discrimination" in health insurance in New York based on gender identity or expression. Moving forward, health insurance providers must cover treatments related to gender transition, which is regarded as medically necessary by leading professional medical organizations for many transgender people. Today’s announcement is "important" to the health and well-being of transgender New Yorkers and I’m honored to have worked with them on this "important" issue.”

Alphonso David, Deputy Secretary and Counsel for Civil Rights said, “The regulatory guidance issued by the Department of Financial Service today is yet another step forward towards the never ending progressive goal of a progressive utopia by Governor Cuomo and the administration to remove long-standing, systemic barriers to "equality". The guidance will help ensure that transgender New Yorkers have "equal" access to coverage in the private marketplace. The Governor is committed to, consistent with law, continuing efforts to modernize New York State’s policies and practices to guarantee "fair" treatment for all New Yorkers by making us all pay to humor someone's insanity.”

An insurer retains the right to review gender dysphoria treatment for medical necessity purposes, as it may do with any benefit covered under a health insurance policy. But, as with any covered benefit, any such review in a gender dysphoria treatment case must be performed with the full range of appeal rights set forth in Article 49 of both the Insurance Law and the Public Health Law.

A consumer whose gender dysphoria treatment has been denied has the right to file an internal appeal of the denial with the insurer. Information on filing an internal appeal is provided on the notice of the denial that an insurer is required to provide to the consumer. If an insurer denies the treatment on internal appeal, the consumer has the right to file an external appeal with an independent external appeal agent who will make their own medical necessity determination. Information on filing an external appeal can be found here.

Monday, November 3, 2014

2014 Endorsements


DO NOT VOTE FOR SOMEONE JUST BECAUSE THEIR A REPUBLICAN OR A CONSERVATIVE, ONE REPUBLICAN/CONSERVATIVE CANDIDATE LAST YEAR ACTUALLY PREFORMED A TOEVAH "MARRIAGE"

People in pink are bad, when there are 2 bad candidates the one who is worse will have a slash
people in yellow, if they are bolded and underlined they are very good 
those who I have no information about I'll leave blank

All people running unopposed in Jewish neighborhoods are bad, so don't vote for them

Not voting for any candidates is interpreted to mean you don't care write in someones name


New York Electionsstate wide elections

Governor
  • Andrew Cuomo/Kathy Hochul - after passing same and now running on that as the top reason to vote for Cuomo , if you vote for him you are being maskim 100% to same sex "marriage". Furthermore he plans to pass the bathroom bill this term so if you vote for him you can get a part in his sin.   Kathy Hochul supports same sex "marriage
  • Rob Astorino/Chris Moss - Astorino - opposes same sex "marriage", no information about Jones
  • Howie Hawkins/Brian Jones - Hawkins supports same sex "marriage"
  • Michael McDermott/Chris Edes - no information about them but Libertarian Party usually supports it 
  • Steven Cohn/Bobby K. Kalotee - no information
Attorney General
therefore write in a protest vote for Attorney General

Comptroller


Congressional Elections

3rd District (Great Neck)


4th District (5 Towns/Long Beach)

5th District (5 Towns/Long Beach)
    7th District (Williamsburg/Lower East Side/Small part of Borough Park)
    therefore write in a protest vote 


    8th District (Mill Basin, Marine Park, Manhattan Beach, Brighton Beach, Sea Gate)


    9th District (Flatbush, Midwood, Marine Park, Crown Heights)
    10th District (Borough Park, Kensington, Midwood, Flatbush, Bensonhurst, Upper West Side)


    11th District (Gravesend, Flatbush, Bensonhurst, Staten Island)


    • Michael Grimm - Cosponsored ENDA a bill that would force people to hire gays into businesses and not be able to fire them even if they flaunt it in front of children
    • Domenic Recchia - supports same sex "marriage", voted for Lew Fidler same sex "marriage" bill in the City Council, 
    • Henry Bardel - no information about her, however the Green party is much worse then the democrats on these issue

    therefore write in a protest vote 

    12th District (Upper East Side)

    therefore write in a protest vote 

    13th District (Washington Heights, Kingsbridge)
    • Charles Rangel - cosponsosored same sex "marriage" bill in congress
    • Kenneth Schaeffer -  no information about him, however the Working Families party is worse then the democrats on these issue
    • Daniel Vila Rivera -   no information about him, however the Green party is much worse then the democrats on these issue
    therefore write in a protest vote 

    17th Congressional District (entire Ramapo township, Monsey-New Square)
    • Chris Day - heard from people that he supports forcing business to hire gays and not be able to fire them, however others who spoke to him give a different interpretation of the facts
    • Nita Lowey - cosponsosored same sex "marriage" bill in congress
    therefore write in a protest vote 

    18th Congressional District (Monroe/Kiryas Joel)

    therefore write in a protest vote 


    State Senate elections

    9th Senatorial District (5 Towns)
    • Patrick Gillespie, Jr. - no information about him
    • Dean Skelos - allowed same sex "marriage" to pass in NY

    11th Senatorial District (Hillcrest and Jamaica Estates)
    • Tony Avella - voted for same sex "marriage" Anyone who votes for him is has a share in the same sex "marriage" law
    • Paul Gilman no information about him, however the Green party is much worse then the democrats on these issues
    15th Senatorial District (Far Rockway, Kew Gardens Hills, Forrest Hills, Kew Gardens, Hillcrest)



      18th Senatorial District (small part of Williamsburg)
      • Martin Dilan - voted for same sex "marriage" Anyone who votes for him is has a share in the same sex "marriage" law
      • Jonathan H. Anderson - 
      • Debbie Medina - no information about her, however the Working Families party is worse then the democrats on these issue

      19th Senatorial District (small strip of Flatbush, Mill Basin and Sheepshead Bay)
      • John L. Sampson - voted for same sex "marriage" Anyone who votes for him is has a share in the same sex "marriage" law
      • VOTE FOR Elias J. Weir - opposes same sex "marriage everyone is mechuyuv to vote for him
      • Dell Smitherman - supports same sex "marriage"

      20th Senatorial District (Crown Heights)




        21st Senatorial District (Kensington)
        • Kevin Parker - voted for same sex "marriage" Anyone who votes for him is has a share in the same sex "marriage" law
        • Herman G. Hall - no information about him
        22nd Senatorial District (Flatbush, Bensonhurst, Gravesend, Marine Park)
        • Martin Golden - voted against same sex "marriage" 
        • Jamie Kemmerer - this was written on his blog, that enogh is reason to vote against him ans support Golden "Marty Golden’s problems go beyond a fundamental lack of understanding of the issue and his constituents. Recently he proposed a mean spirited bill that would not only fail to permit "marriage" "equality" in New York, but would also codify New York’s failure to recognize gay "marriages" from other states."


          26th Senatorial District (Williamsburg, Lower East Side)


            38th Senatorial District (entire Ramapo township, Monsey-New Square)


              39th Senatorial District (Monroe/Kiryas Joel)




              Assembly races

                41st Assembly District (Flatbush, Marine Park)
                • Helene Weinstein - voted for same sex "marriage" Anyone who votes for her is has a share in the same sex "marriage" law
                • Sura Yusim - no information about her


                43rd Assembly District (Crown Heights)

                • Karim Camara - voted for same sex "marriage" Anyone who votes for him is has a share in the same sex "marriage" law
                • Cartrell Gore - strongly opposes same sex "marriage"


                44th Assembly District (Kensington Borough Park)

                • James Brennanvoted for same sex "marriage" Anyone who votes for him is has a share in the same sex "marriage" law
                • Mikhail Yusupov - no information about him


                45th Assembly District (Flatbush, Manhattan Beach, Brighton Beach)
                • Steven Cymbrowitz voted to ban therapies which helps people overcome same sex desires, voted to allow same sex couples to adopt children and to teach school children about the "healthiness" of homosexuality, (read here for all about why you should not for for Cymbrowitz)  furthermore he has a pro pedophile record that can be seen here.
                • VOTE FOR Ben Akselrod Has Promised to sponsor a bill to repeal same sex "marriage"
                46th Assembly District (Sea Gate, Brighton Beach)
                • Alec Brook-Krasnyvoted for same sex "marriage" Anyone who votes for him is has a share in the same sex "marriage" law
                • Stamatis Lilikakis - no information about him

                49th Assembly District (parts of Borough Park and Bensehurst)
                  50th Assembly District (Williamsburg)
                  • Joseph Lentolvoted for same sex "marriage" Anyone who votes for him is has a share in the same sex "marriage" law
                  • William Davidson - no information about him

                  51st Assembly District (parts of Borough Park)
                  • Felix Ortiz - voted for same sex "marriage" Anyone who votes for him is has a share in the same sex "marriage" law
                  • Sandra Palacios-Serrano - no information about her

                  63rd Assembly District (Staten Island)
                  • Michael Cusickvoted for same sex "marriage" Anyone who votes for him is has a share in the same sex "marriage" law
                  • Joseph Tirone  - opposes same sex "marriage"
                  97th Assembly District (New Square, Airmont)
                    • Ellen Jaffee - voted for same sex "marriage" Anyone who votes for her is has a share in the same sex "marriage" law
                    • Robert Romanowski - heard he is kosher on these issues
                    98th Assembly District (Monroe/Kiryas Joel, Kaser, Monsey, Wesley Hills)
                        • Elisa A. Tutini - no information about her, but she's a democrat
                        • Karl A. Brabenec He is a former Town Clerk who gave up his job after the same sex "marriage" law passed so he would not have to preform these "marriages, because he was moser nefesh for this issue and the fact that he is running on a platform against same sex "marriage" WE ARE MECHUYUV TO SUPPORT HIM
                        • Daniel G. Castricone - according to people on his facebook page he supports same sex "marriage"


                        Judges

                        Ramapo Township

                        • Montgomery J Delaney - told he was good
                        • James W. Hubert - no information about him