"Orthodox" David Greenfield And Chaim Deutsch Vote For Abortion On Demand Resolution

On January 22 the City Council voted in favor of passing a resolution in favor of abortion on demand. Both "Orthodox" Jews (David Greenfield and Chaim Deutsch) in the City Council voted for this resolution, they didn't even have the decency to abstain from voting for it.  Immediately after passing this resolution they voted in favor of a resolution commemorating the 70th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz, leading David Greenfield making his infamous statement regarding gays, Israel, and Auschwitz.

In 2009 41% of all pregnancies in New York City ended in abortion! The African American Abortion rate was 59.8%!

The vote Greenfield and Deutsch made for abortion on demand

Text of the resolution 

Resolution calling upon the United States Congress to pass legislation to protect a woman's health, her right to determine whether and when to bear a child, and her ability to exercise that right by limiting government interference with the provision of abortion services and ensuring legal, safe abortion care is available to any woman who needs it.
By Council Members Cumbo, Crowley, Johnson, Kallos, Garodnick, Chin, Lander, Levine and Mendez

• Whereas, In 1973, the United States Supreme Court legalized abortion throughout the country with the Roe v. Wade decision; and
• Whereas, Central to the decision is the premise that the right to make childbearing choices is fundamental to women's lives and their ability to participate fully and equally in society; and
• Whereas, Since 1973, many states have passed measures with the intentions of whittling away at this right; and
• Whereas, According to the Guttmacher Institute, in just the last four years, states have enacted 231 abortion restrictions; and
• Whereas, Many of these restrictions create numerous delays and hardships for women such as denial of access to early abortion procedures, increased risks to health and increased expenses as well as burdensome logistical planning; and
• Whereas, Often times these burdens fall more heavily on low-income women, women of color, young women and women living in rural areas; and
• Whereas, According to July 2014 testimony provided by Nancy Northup, the CEO of the Center for Reproductive Rights, "… the only thing holding back the further spread of these very real threats to women's health and lives are court orders blocking these laws from taking effect;" and
• Whereas, In order to address many of these concerns the Women's Health Protection Act (WHPA) was introduced, and later died, in the last Congressional session; and
• Whereas, The WHPA would protect a woman's right to safe and legal abortion by limiting restrictions on the provision of abortion services ; and
• Whereas, The WHPA's findings state that "Congress has the authority to protect women's ability to access abortion services pursuant to its powers under the Commerce Clause and its powers under section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution to enforce the provisions of section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment"; and
• Whereas, It is essential that this legislation be re-introduced and passed in this current session of Congress because 42 years after the Roe v. Wade decision there is a renewed threat to women's access to safe and affordable abortions; and
• Whereas, Reproductive health care is an important component of women's overall health, and reproductive freedom is equally important to women's safety and well-being; and
• Whereas, Despite Roe v. Wade being the law of the land, many states have drastically restricted women's ability to access necessary and timely reproductive health care and limited doctors' ability to provide such care; now, therefore, be it
• Resolved, That the Council of the City of New York calls upon the United States Congress to pass legislation to protect a woman's health, her right to determine whether and when to bear a child, and her ability to exercise that right by limiting government interference with the provision of abortion services and ensuring legal, safe abortion care is available to any woman who needs it.

Andrew Cuomo Wants To Make New York Orthodox-Judenrein

Andrew Cuomo's New York

• You have a schism within the Republican Party. … They’re searching to define their soul, that’s what’s going on. Is the Republican party in this state a moderate party or is it an extreme conservative party? That’s what they’re trying to figure out. It’s a mirror of what’s going on in Washington. The gridlock in Washington is less about Democrats and Republicans. It’s more about extreme Republicans versus moderate Republicans.
  … You’re seeing that play out in New York. … The Republican Party candidates are running against the SAFE Act — it was voted for by moderate Republicans who run the Senate! Their problem is not me and the Democrats; their problem is themselves. Who are they? Are they these extreme conservatives who are right-to-life, pro-assault-weapon, anti-gay? Is that who they are? Because if that’s who they are and they’re the extreme conservatives, they have no place in the state of New York, because that’s not who New Yorkers are.
  If they’re moderate Republicans like in the Senate right now, who control the Senate — moderate Republicans have a place in their state. George Pataki was governor of this state as a moderate Republican; but not what you’re hearing from them on the far right.”

  Andrew Cuomo's statement

Cuomo wants to add NY to this list

Why No Jew Should Vote For Joe Lhota, vote For Erick Salgado On The School Choice Line

If You Vote For Joe Lhota You telling the world that you don't care about same gender "marriage", abortion on demand, drugs etc.  Future candidates will take note and ignore these issues in the future (and future social issues) .  We need to send a message nationally that it doesn't pay to be a Socially Liberal Republican.  If you want to make a Kiddush Hashem, not make a Chillul Hashem, be a or lagoyim and a part of mamleches kohanim vegoy kadosh vote for Erick Salgado (the ONLY mayor candidate who believes in morality) On The School Choice Line!


If done by enough people it could have national implication and help stem the tide of Republicans becoming liberal Democrats when it comes to morality!

David Greenfield Voted That Congress (You) Should Pay For Abortions

read the entire bill

 So David Greenfield want's congress to pay for "Comprehensive Reproductive Health Care" which includes abortions!

Read about some of David Greenfield's other anti Torah votes supporting toevah "marriage", supporting Late Term Abortions.

Do You Want To Pay For Abortions?
Vote Against Greenfield Tuesday November 5th

Daniel Squadron: On Why Orthodox Jews Should Vote For Him

Daniel Squadron's latest flier.

בהסכמת "הרעבנים" "ועסקנים" דוויליאמסברג

check list on why NOT to vote for Daniel Squadron
 ✓has 100% approval rating by the biggest abortion on demand orginazation
✓one of the major pushers of same gender "marriage"
✓the leading sponsor of genda (This could force sefariem stores to hire men with skirts, and would allow men in to woman's bathrooms)
✓wants to make NY have more abortions (41% is to low)
✓has the endorsement of 3 leading gay orginazations

Insane Headline Of the Year: Not Everyone Who Has An Abortion Is A Woman

Anybody who actually understands this article and is not fighting modern day liberalism and it's promoters (liberal candidates) is a RASHA GAMUR!

The "War on Women" isn't just a war on women. Trans men and gender-non-conforming people are losing their rights too, and we need to rework how we frame these "women's issues."

The last month has been particularly brutal for abortion rights activists and women's health advocates, as state after state has proposed and/or passed various bills that restrict abortion access and undermine abortion care. In response, there has been a re-energized reproductive rights movement, with many across the nation stating that they "Stand With Texas Women" or "Stand With North Carolina Women." But in this response, abortion rights activists have overlooked and dismissed a very important reality: Not everyone who has an abortion is a woman.

Abortion is so often framed as a women's issue by both those who advocate for abortion rights and those who seek to dismiss abortion as frivolous. And for abortion rights, a movement that took root in the late 1960s and early 1970s, this makes sense. Prior to a deeper understanding and problematizing of gender and the way that it works, in our social construction, only women had abortions because only women could get pregnant. But in 2013, we should know better, and we need to do better.

At this crucial moment for reproductive freedom and abortion access, the abortion rights movement stands at yet another crossroads: How do we adequately address and include those who have abortions but are not women?

We must acknowledge and come to terms with the implicit cissexism in assuming that only women have abortions. Trans men have abortions. People who do not identify as women have abortions. They deserve to be represented in our advocacy and activist framework. Honestly, I am guilty of perpetuating that harmful myth, both in my rhetoric and framing. I often frame abortion restrictions as misogynistic attacks meant to control women's reproductive lives, and that is true. But abortion restrictions also affect the lives of people who aren't women, and they hinder trans men and gender-non-conforming people and others who were Designated Female at Birth (DFAB) from accessing abortion care, as well.

"Stand with Ohio Women" and the "War on Women" may be great rallying cries, but they also very clearly reiterate the notion that abortion is both solely a women's issue and that only women have abortions. This can make those in the trans community feel excluded, and it can deter them from both seeking the abortion care they may need or becoming actively involved in abortion rights advocacy.




Leading the way on becoming more gender inclusive around the issue of abortion is the New York Abortion Access Fund (NYAAF), which recently agreed to shift its mission statement and values to reflect more gender inclusive language. NYAAF also created a Gender Inclusive Task Force to reach out to the LGBTQ communities and inform them that NYAAF helps fund abortions for all people, not just women. They state:

We want to make sure that NYAAF isn't just working toward every woman's right to access affordable abortion care, but every person's right, regardless of their gender. We realized that embracing gender inclusivity is about more than not assuming the gender pronouns that our callers use or replacing 'woman' with 'people' everywhere on our website. Becoming gender inclusive is an important part of our values as an organization.

More abortion rights and abortion care organizations need to follow suit with NYAAF. But individual activists can take action on a smaller level, even without the official sanctioning of nonprofits and advocacy organizations. We can begin by listening.

NYAAF "Values"

Ellen, who identifies as transgenderqueer, notes that "the best thing [cisgender] allies can do is to be receptive to criticism and ask trans people for alternatives. When you do this, it shows that you're listening and aware that your choice of language makes an impact." As Ellen also highlighted, trans people often feel that they are a burden to cisgender (which means your gender identity is the same as the sex with which you were born) abortion rights activists when they call out the problematic and exclusionary language upon which we rely.
Beyond that, we should begin to accept and grapple with, on individual and community levels, what it means to frame abortion as a women's issue and why we continue to be so reluctant or unable to be more gender inclusive. This requires effort, yes, but it is essential to our work and to a deeper understanding that reproductive justice does not only apply to women, but to all people. All people who need an abortion should be able to access one, and that does not solely apply to women.

I agree that restricting abortion rights is a misogynistic attempt to control women's reproductive lives and undermine women's reproductive autonomy. I firmly believe that misogyny lies at the heart of restricting abortion rights. But I also acknowledge that the misogyny of restricting abortion rights applies to trans* people, too. It affects a trans man who needs an abortion in North Dakota just as much as it does a cisgender woman in Texas. As Ellen so poignantly said, "this abortion debate is about agency, about choice and about attacks on our bodies," and that includes those who are not women.

So yes, I stand with women. I also stand with trans men and gender-non-conforming people. Do you?
Here is a helpful glossary of trans, genderqueer, and queer terms.
(truth-out)

David Greenfield Votes For Resolution In Favor Of Abortion On Demand!

On June 12th The City Council voted to pass a resolution urging Albany to pass the so called "Women’s Equality Act".  The 10th plank of the "Women’s Equality Act" was one of the most extreme "abortion on demand" laws ever.  David Greenfield along with the entire City Council voted for the abortion on demand bill, except for 7 people (4 voted against and 3 abstained).   Meanwhile Simcha Felder based on the psak of his rav was willing to stay in Albany over Shabbos to vote against the bill.  David Greenfield Previously ignored the psak of many rabbaniem by endorsing pro same gender "marriage" Lew Fidler.

In 2009 41% of all pregnancies in New York City ended in abortion! The African American Abortion rate was 59.8%!

The vote Greenfield made for abortion on demand

60% Of Black Babies Are Aborted/Year: Sandra Fluke Endorses Quinn To Increase That Number!

NYC already is the Abortion Capital of the World!  (60% of Black Babies Are aborted per year in NYC)

NEW YORK (WABC) -- Eye-opening statistics about the rate of abortions in New York City have been released by the Health Department. 

It raises questions about the effectiveness of current birth control education.

41% of all New York City pregnancies end in abortion.

The rate for minorities is even higher.

Both sides say the high abortion percentage is a crisis.

"If 41% of New York babies are aborted, with the percentage even higher in the Bronx and among our African-American babies in the world, it is downright chilling," New York Archbishop Timothy Dolan said.
Broken down by race for 2009:

Specifically
non-Hispanic Blacks have a 59.8% abortion rate.
Hispanics have a 41.3% abortion rate.

Asians have a 22.7% abortion rate.
And non-Hispanic Whites have a 20.4% abortion rate.

The fact that 41% of all pregnancies in New York City end in abortion is not a secret and it's not anything new.

In fact, things have been getting better over the past decade.

Back in 1998, 12 years ago, the number was actually 46%.

Planned Parenthood is also not happy about the numbers, but pushes education.
"We believe in comprehensive sex education, which by the way does include abstinence, but abstinence by itself has been proven to be ineffective,"

Archbishop Dolan reiterated the pro-abstinence, pro-life, anti-contraceptive position of the church.
"My word, what have we done the last 30 years. There's candy bowls on people's desks with condoms, they're dropping them from airplanes, yet nothing seems to improve, so they've been on the wrong track here," Archbishop Dolan said.
(ABC)

Cuomo Trys To Pass Abortion After Simcha Felder Left For Shabbos

GOP Charges Dems With Gaming in Erev Shabbos Vote

By Yochonon Donn

Tuesday, July 2, 2013 | כ"ד תמוז תשע"ג

ALBANY - It was Erev Shabbos at the New York State Capitol, and Simcha Felder, a state senator who is an Orthodox Jew, was itching to cast his vote on a controversial measure concerning the state’s unborn pushed by liberal Democrats and then travel to Lakewood where he would be spending Shabbos with his family.

Felder, the deciding vote on the pending bill, got a psak from a Rav he consulted that due to the life-and-death nature of the bill, he was permitted, even required, to remain in Albany for Shabbos if that meant he could kill the bill.

But as the morning dragged on, Felder saw no sign that the Senate was readying for a vote.

It was a drama that played out this past Friday in Albany.

The bill itself was passed earlier by the Senate but only with nine non-controversial parts attached, such as establishing equal pay for women. Senate Co-Majority Leader Dean Skelos (R-Rockville Centre) did not allow the tenth clause to be brought to a vote.

However, Jeff Klein, leader of the four-member Independent Democratic Conference which is allied with Gov. Andrew Cuomo, wanted to hand a victory to the Democratic governor, who said in his state of the state address back in January that the bill was a top domestic priority.

Klein’s plan, one which Republicans say was coordinated with the Senate Democrats, was to add the divisive tenth clause to a medical records bill sponsored by Sen. Marty Golden (R-Flatbush). As Friday was the last day of the 2013 session, it was known that that was the day when it would come for a vote.

But Felder, his eye on the clock as it passed noon, listened in the chamber as Democrats made rambling floor speeches and asked questions, obviously indifferent to the fact that Shabbos would begin at 8:12 in Brooklyn, three hours away from Albany. Cuomo was still making calls to Republican senators, trying to peel off at least one of them to allow the amendment to pass.

“You know they are waiting for you to leave for Shabbos,” Sen. Thomas Libous, a Binghamton Republican who is the floor leader of the majority coalition, told Felder matter-of-factly.

At about 4:15 p.m., Felder left the chamber and spotted Sen. Liz Krueger (D-Manhattan) in the hallway.

“It looks like we will be spending Shabbos together in Albany,” he told the non-religious Jewish senator, according to the GOP sources, who paraphrased the conversation for Hamodia.

“Why?” Krueger asked in surprise. “You’re not leaving?”

“No,” Felder said. “I am staying until the bill is struck down.”

Felder then returned to the chamber, and within 15 minutes, the entire Democratic conference was there, six hours after the session had been scheduled to begin. Klein presented his amendment, and it went down 32 to 31, with Felder as the decisive vote.

Republican sources are now charging their Democratic counterparts of exploiting Felder’s status as a shomer Shabbos to slip what would have been a landmark progressive bill through the legislature.

“By slowing things down,” Mark Hansen, a spokesman for the GOP caucus, told Hamodia Tuesday, “that certainly would impact that particular piece of legislation in terms of the timing of Senator Felder and when he needed to leave to observe the Sabbath.”

If Felder would have left Albany, the bill would have had a 31-31 tie, with Lt. Gov. Robert Duffy casting the deciding vote in favor. The GOP is claiming that the Democrats conferencing that day was merely a ploy to deny the chamber the quorum needed to vote, until Felder left.

“Obviously, the Democrats in the Senate wanted to pass this amendment,” Hansen said, “and they were slowing down the session on a Friday afternoon.”

Keith Glazer, a spokeswoman for state Sen. Andrea Stewart-Cousins, the Democratic leader of the Senate, denied the charge emphatically.

“I was in the conference at the time,” Glazer said, “[and Stewart-Cousins] had no knowledge” that Felder would be staying in Albany.

Andrew Goldston, a spokesman for Krueger, said that the senator did not pass on any message to Stewart-Cousins that Felder would be staying in Albany for Shabbos.

“We just think that that rumor is categorically false,” Goldston said. “I mean, [Krueger] may have heard something about Sen. Felder’s travel plans but we weren’t stalling that day, and we certainly weren’t stalling to find out anything about Sen. Felder.”

Glazer said that at the conference, the Democrats were discussing how to vote on the nine other parts of the bill, not the Klein amendment. Calling it a “surprise amendment,” she said they were not even aware that he would be bringing such a bill that day.

“Klein’s amendment wasn’t a bill per se that they would have conference,” Glazer said. “It wasn’t a bill that was brought up on the floor. … The Democratic conference, under Sen. Stewart-Cousins, had no idea that they would be bringing a hostile amendment to the floor.”

A hostile amendment refers to an amendment attached to another unrelated bill. There is usually no advance warning that it will be presented. But a Senate Republican source said that due to the nature of this bill, the Democrats must have known that the bill would be tabled on Friday.

The offices of both Stewart-Cousins and Krueger noted that it was Klein who offered the amendment without discussing with them, and referred questions to him.

A press person in Klein’s office said they were not sure they would have any comment but would get back to Hamodia. Nobody from the senator’s office called back by press time.

In the meantime, the bill was killed at 4:50, and by 5:20, too late to make it to Lakewood, Felder was on the road to Brooklyn, chauffeured with the help of the Republican caucus.

He made it to his home in Brooklyn 10 minutes before Shabbos began.

Felder refused to comment on the allegations beyond saying, “I hope and pray that nobody had the audacity to discriminate against somebody’s religious beliefs to manipulate the process for political purposes.”

But he said that he was grateful to be able to strike down a bill of such immoral values.

“It’s very rare that Hashem gives you an opportunity to have such as impact on such a critical issue,” he said.

(Hamodia) 

IH the Hamodia will continue and increase the amount of articles like this.

"Orthodox" Phillip Goldfeder Votes For Biggest Abortion Bill Ever

"Orthodox" Phillip Goldfeder former aide to Michael Bloomberg and Charles Schumer, and current Far Rockway assemblyman voted for the biggest abortion bill in NY State history.

20th Year Anniversary Of The Gay Manifesto

Jerry Nadler telling Orthodox Jews "they can go sliding down to hell on their butts"

On April 25, 1993 the toevanicks had a rally called "The March on Washington for Lesbian, Gay, and Bi Equal Rights and Liberation" where they made official list of demands.  Many "noted" politicians attended including Congressman Jerry Nadler, David Dinkins, and Nancy Pelosi.  Also attending was Rev. Jesse Jackson (of hymietown fame). The National Park Service estimated attendance at 300,000, however non surprisingly organizers of the event claimed 1,000,000 attended the March.


video of the event

 While there they gave a list of demands they wanted.


here is the full list of their demands. Notice how much they wanted then, and how much they got because they pushed hard and voted the "right" way.  The scary part now that they practically got all they originally wanted what will they put on their next platform.

Platform of the 1993 March on Washington for Lesbian, Gay, and Bi Equal Rights and Liberation Action


Statement Preamble to the Platform

The Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender movement recognizes that our quest for social justice fundamentally links us to the struggles against racism and sexism, class bias, economic injustice and religious intolerance. We must realize if one of us is oppressed we all are oppressed. The diversity of our movement requires and compels us to stand in opposition to all forms of oppression that diminish the quality of life for all people. We will be vigilant in our determination to rid our movement and our society of all forms of oppression and exploitation, so that all of us can develop to our full human potential without regard to race, religion, sexual orientation, identification, identity, gender and gender expression, ability, age or class.

THE MARCH DEMANDS
1. We demand passage of a Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender civil rights bill and an end to discrimination by state and federal governments including the military; repeal of all sodomy laws and other laws that criminalize private sexual expression between consenting adults.

* Passage of "The Civil Rights Amendment Act of 1991" (HR 1430 & S574).
* Repeal of Department of Defense directive 1332.14.
* Repeal of laws prohibiting sodomy, cross-gender expression (dress codes) or  non-coercive sexual behavior between consenting adults.
* Amendment of the Code of Federal Regulations to recognize same-sex relationships.
* Passage of the Equal Rights Amendment
* Implementation of, funding for and enforcement of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1991.
* Passage and implementation of graduated age-of-consent laws.

2. We demand massive increase in funding for AIDS education, research, and patient care; universal access to health care including alternative therapies; and an end to sexism in medical research and health care.

* The provision of responsive, appropriate health care for people with disabilities, deaf and hard of hearing people.
* Revision of the Centers for Disease Control definition of AIDS to include infections particular to women.
* Implementation of the recommendation-of the National AIDS Commission  immediately.
* A massive increase in funding for AIDS education, research and care--money for AIDS, not for war.

   This money should come from the defense budget, not existing social services.

* An increase in funding and research to provide an independent study of HIV infection in women, People of * Color, Bisexuals, Heterosexuals, children, and women to women transmission.
* Access to anonymous testing for HIV.
* No mandatory HIV testing.
* A cure for AIDS.
* The development and legalization of a national needle exchange program.
* Free substance abuse treatment on demand.
* The redefinition of sexual reassignment surgeries as medical, not cosmetic, treatment.
* The provision of appropriate medical treatment for all transgendered people in prisons and hospitals.
* An increase in funding and research for chronic illness, including breast ovarian, and other cancers particular to women.
* The right of all people with chronic illness, including HIV/AIDS, to choices in medical treatment as well as the right to end such treatment.

3. We demand legislation to prevent discrimination against Lesbians, Gays, Bisexuals and Transgendered people in the areas of family diversity, custody, adoption and foster care and that the definition of family includes the full diversity of all family structures.

* The recognition and legal protection of whole range of family structures.
* An end to abuse and exploitation of and discrimination against youth.
* An end to abuse and exploitation of and discrimination against older/old people.
* Full implementation of the recommendations contained in the report of the Health and Human Services
* Task Force on Youth Suicide.
* Recognition of domestic partnerships.
* Legalization of same sex marriages.

4. We demand full and equal inclusion of Lesbians, Gays, Bisexuals and Transgendered people in the educational system, and inclusion of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender studies in multicultural curricula.

* Culturally inclusive Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Studies program; and information on abortion, AIDS/HIV, childcare and sexuality at all levels of education.
* Establishment of campus offices and programs to address Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender students special needs.
* The ban of all discriminatory ROTC programs and recruiters from learning institutions.
* An end to discrimination at all levels of education.

5. We demand the right to reproductive freedom and choice, to control our own bodies, and an end to sexist discrimination.

* The right to control our bodies.
* Unrestricted, safe and affordable alternative insemination.
* An end to sterilization abuse.
* That access to safe and affordable abortion and contraception be available to all people on demand, without restriction and regardless of age.
* That access to unbiased and complete information about the full range of reproductive options be available to all people, regardless of age.

6. We demand an end to racial and ethnic discrimination in all forms.

Support for non-racist policies and affirmative action.
* An end to institutionalized racism.
* Equal economic opportunity and an end to poverty.
* Full reproductive rights, improvement of prenatal services, availability of alternative insemination for Lesbians and Bisexual women of color.
* Repeal all 'English Only' laws and restore and enforce bilingual education.
* Repeal all discriminatory immigration laws based on race and HIV status .
* A commitment to ending racism, including internalized racism, sexism and all forms of religious and ethnic oppression in our communities and in this country.
* An end to the genocide of all the indigenous peoples and their cultures
* Restoration of the self-determination of all indigenous people of the world.

7. We demand an end to discrimination and violent oppression based on actual or perceived sexual orientation, identification, race, religion, identity, sex and gender expression, disability, age, class, AIDS/HIV infection.

* An end to anti-Semitism.
* An end to sexist oppression.
* An end to discrimination against people with disabilities, deaf and hard of hearing people.
* An end to discrimination based on sexual orientation in all programs of the Boy Scouts of America.
* An end to economic injustice in this country and internationally.
* An end to discrimination against prisoners with HIV/AIDS.
* An end to discrimination against people with HIV/AIDS, and those perceived as having HIV/AIDS.
* An end to consideration of gender dysphoria as a psychiatric disorder.
* An end to hate crimes including police brutality, rape and bashing.
* An end to censorship.